i haven't looked much at the wicket security solution there are now
i would say talk to the security master: Maurice :)
johan
On 6/1/07, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi johan,
hmm then i have to stopp working on it right now...
because i am already passed the hour again
good
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I thought about that too but then I still have to drag in some JSP's for
the login page and somehow
integrate Acegi's authz taglib for conditional content. Not that it's a
big deal but it literally all feels
a bit mixed, I prefer to keep it pure.
For the pure
As apparently not every author in this thread sees all the steps needed to
use Acegi with Wicket, I am currently writing a howto on the Wicket wiki.
The howto is extracted from a production system and describes the
combination of Wicket, Acegi and Wicket-auth-roles. It will take a couple of
days
* Erik van Oosten:
As apparently not every author in this thread sees all the steps
needed to use Acegi with Wicket, I am currently writing a howto
on the Wicket wiki. The howto is extracted from a production
system and describes the combination of Wicket, Acegi and
Hey, one hour per day contributing to Open Source is already a
lot!
hmm then i have to stopp working on it right now...
because i am already passed the hour again
johan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2
hi johan,
hmm then i have to stopp working on it right now...
because i am already passed the hour again
good work! thanx for doing so!
have you seen my example how to use acegi without using filters?
best regards, --- jan.
huhu!
i just gave acegi with your wicket-role-model a try and came up with this quick
implementation (2 java 1 xml-file):
http://wicket.silberlicht.de/misc/acegi-wicket.tar.gz (2k size)
you need the acegi-framework from
http://www.acegisecurity.org/
and the spring.jar (acegi needs this for
Hello all,
I'm migrating an existing Struts app to Wicket and have now reached the
point where I have to add authentication/authorization to it.
In the Struts app I used Acegi to add URL-based security. Ideally I'd re-use my
existing Acegi config for Wicket but I can't find any documentation on
If you are using wicket 1.3 you could try the new wicket security
framework swarm. unlike acegi it is not url based but component based.
It was designed with simplicity in mind so you should be able to get
started right away.
You can find documentation here
There was a thread some time ago.
In http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=7285394framed=y this
message I explained how we use Acegi in combination with wicket-auth-roles.
Regards,
Erik.
Mr Mean wrote:
I am not sure if there is an existing wicket-acegi framework but i
According to your mail, you are only using acegi to do the
authentication and let auth-roles handle the authorization.
Swarm provides functionality to handle both authentication and
authorization and is perfectly capable of delegating to whatever
authentication framework you desire.
Maurice
On
Indeed. I was replying to give a reference to using Acegi.
I think now, Swarm is the way to go.
Regards,
Erik.
Mr Mean wrote:
According to your mail, you are only using acegi to do the
authentication and let auth-roles handle the authorization.
Swarm provides functionality to
I'm using 1.2.6 so swarm is not in the picture. Will check out auth-roles
as I'm on java 1.5, thx!
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Maurice Marrink wrote:
If you are using wicket 1.3 you could try the new wicket security
framework swarm. unlike acegi it is not url based but component based.
It was
Johan, has an excellent point, but we too have a pre wicket 1.3 app so
i guess i'll have to make a branche for that app anyhow if i want to
replace or old security mechanisme.
I don't think it will be much work to backport to 1.2.6.
Let me know if you plan on staying with wicket 1.2.x or upgrade
Hi Marice,
While here may I ask a quick question? I've quickly glanced through the docs
at Wiki and could see some reference to Hivemind. Does this implementation
employs Apache HiveMind and if so I assume I have to place yet another jar
on my classpath. Right or not?
Regards,
Francis
On
Francis,
Swarm does not use apache hivemind. The hivemind reference you saw in
the example code is to an internal class who is coincidentally named
like apache hivemind.
Swarm only requires the following jars besides wicket: Wasp,
commons-logging and Log4j.
Maurice
On 5/29/07, Francis Amanfo
Yes, I thought so too since I couldn't see any package reference to apache
hivemind but just the name Hivemind, but to be sure I decided to ask.
Thanks for the answer and great work.
Francis
On 5/29/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francis,
Swarm does not use apache hivemind.
No problem and thanks.
Have you decided yet if you are going to upgrade to wicket 1.3?
Maurice
On 5/29/07, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I thought so too since I couldn't see any package reference to apache
hivemind but just the name Hivemind, but to be sure I decided to ask.
On 5/29/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Swarm only requires the following jars besides wicket: Wasp,
commons-logging and Log4j.
You did notice that Wicket now uses slf4j instead of clogging?
Martijn
--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains
* Thies Edeling:
I'm migrating an existing Struts app to Wicket and
have now reached the point where I have to add
authentication/authorization to it. In the Struts app I used
Acegi to add URL-based security. Ideally I'd re-use my existing
Acegi config
I know martijn and i will fix this, in the meantime i would like to
add to my defense that i am not the only stuff project to use log4j :)
Maurice
On 5/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Swarm only requires the following jars
I know martijn and i will fix this, in the meantime i would like to
add to my defense that i am not the only stuff project to use log4j :)
You mean commons-logging :)
Eelco
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
I'm migrating an existing Struts app to Wicket and
have now reached the point where I have to add
authentication/authorization to it. In the Struts app I used
Acegi to add URL-based security. Ideally I'd re-use my existing
Acegi config for Wicket but I
:) indeed i realized my mistake after i hit the send button :)
Maurice
On 5/29/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know martijn and i will fix this, in the meantime i would like to
add to my defense that i am not the only stuff project to use log4j :)
You mean commons-logging :)
Hi list,
Just wondering if anybody has successfully used the Acegi security
framework with Wicket (Phil?). I'm currently using Acegi with
SpringMVC and I'd like to use it with Spring/Wicket.
I guess the techniques from the signin examples will do for now, but
in future I need more
I just had a consultancy gig with a customer last week (one of the
world's largest banks) who had massive troubles with implementing
portlet technology just because of the historical dependency on URLs
(they use SiteMinder) for authentication/ authorisation.
Now, I don't want to downplay the
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:28 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
Now, I don't want to downplay the advantages a product like
SiteMinder or Acegi
I opened an issue for it:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1250242group_id=119783atid=684978
Help is appreciated!
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple
arising
in any
way from receipt or use thereof.
- Original Message - From: Bennett, Timothy (JIS -
Applications)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
-Original
29 matches
Mail list logo
