Hi all,
A collegue of mine at a very big and slow organization is evaluating
web frameworks, of which one is wicket. As expected, there is the
remark that wicket is not scalable because of its use of session scope.
I already gave the most important arguments, but it would be nice to
have some
(Breaking my week-long self-inflicted moratorium)
Erik, I am very interested in your other arguments that would interest
big slow companies.
Regards,
Erik.
Erik Brakkee schreef:
Hi all,
A collegue of mine at a very big and slow organization is evaluating
web frameworks, of which
Ok, and don't forget the robustness. I really haven't seen any weird or unexpected behavior or wicket at all. On 9/26/06, Erik Brakkee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,Let me rephrase the question:What arguments did you use, that would
The first argument was that not every application needs to scale to
thousands of concurrent users. The second argument is that active
replication is only one strategy for clustering. In practise, server
affinity is also a very good option.
Perhaps another argument, that I did not mention yet, is
Or this one?
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t70272.html
Erik.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
Hi Erik,
Let me rephrase the question:
What arguments did you use, that would interest big slow companies in
adopting Wicket?
Regards,
Erik.
PS. Too many Eriks in The Netherlands :)
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
On 9/26/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or this one?http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t70272.htmlErik.
Yes that was it! Thanks!
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
Erik,did you search this link?http://www.virtuas.com/articles/webframework-sweetspots.html
-Dirk2006/9/26, Erik Brakkee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
A collegue of mine at a very big and slow organization is evaluating
web frameworks, of which one is wicket. As expected, there is the
remark that
Not anything downloadable I'm afraid. But here is my current brain
dump on the matter.
The most important question: what are your scalability needs? If you
are creating a public facing web site with possibly *very* large
fluctuations in user behavior, your scalability needs are way more
important
Perhaps another argument, that I did not mention yet, is that the next
version of wicket will also provide other ways for storing session state.
That exists today/ for 2.0 and 1.2 actually. Session represents the
session state, but ISessionStore hides where the information is
actually stored.
On 9/26/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps another argument, that I did not mention yet, is that the next version of wicket will also provide other ways for storing session state.That exists today/ for 2.0 and 1.2 actually.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
But, in my
When can we expect to see the first alpha and beta releases for 2.0 in
the maven2 repository? This would be nice for use since then we could
start using it already (I don't want to distribute the jars with my
project).http://maven.sateh.com/wicket/-Igor
Good question. I'll propose on the dev list.
Eelco
On 9/26/06, Erik Brakkee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps another argument, that I did not mention yet, is that the next
version of wicket will also provide other ways for storing
Ah, yeah. We have the snapshots to start with.
Eelco
On 9/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When can we expect to see the first alpha and beta releases for 2.0 in the
maven2 repository? This would be nice for use since then we could start
using it already (I don't want to
14 matches
Mail list logo
