Very well. But, this means that not even the Application holds the services
as members. Every call to getService() will go to the spring context, and
create a new proxy, right? This seems sub-optimal. Is the Application object
ever serialized? If it is not, and I make sure never to hold reference
the application is never serialized, so you are free to hold any references
there you like.
-igor
On 4/17/07, nlif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very well. But, this means that not even the Application holds the
services
as members. Every call to getService() will go to the spring context, and
Hi,
I am using Wicket 1.2.5 with the Wicket-Spring extension, but without the
annotation support (I am on JDK 1.4).
It seems there are two ways to integrate with Spring:
1) In my web.xml, to use the SpringWebApplicationFactory, and to define
MyWicketApplication as a bean in my Spring context
On 4/17/07, nlif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I go with (1), then it makes sense to use the fact that the Application
instance is created by Spring, to also inject it with the Services: I just
provide setters. But then - how do I implement the getters so that they
return the proxies?
then
On 1/23/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is strange isn't it
now you fixed it so it works on the server
Hmm.. and it works on my machine as well. Windows Sucks(tm)
Frank
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
yes and i rechecked it in.
Because the file you checked in is just plain wrong.
Those extra empty spaces don't make any sense!
Please recheck if it fails again for you and then test why those extra
spaces are in front of every empty line.
So i guess Windows Rules.. others just suck! :)
johan
Johan Compagner wrote:
So i guess Windows Rules.. others just suck! :)
To rule and to suck can go hand in hand as well :)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Now it works here as well. :)
Good job
On 1/23/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes and i rechecked it in.
Because the file you checked in is just plain wrong.
Those extra empty spaces don't make any sense!
Please recheck if it fails again for you and then test why those extra
jip i noticed this also. I guess it is something that the commented source
code that is removed from
the page after rendering did or whatever.
Can anybody look at the last thing that got stuck:
i already fixed this by not using a file at all but just directly the
inputstream
All test are running fine now on my windows machine. Can somebody with a mac
or linux
look why there are still one or two test failing?
It has to do something with encoding i guess.
johan
On 1/16/07, Frank
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i already fixed this by not using a file at all but just directly the
inputstream
Yeah saw that. :)
All test are running fine now on my windows machine. Can somebody with a mac
or linux
look why there are still one or two test failing?
see: http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/start.action
and then:
http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WICKET2X-WICKET/latest
don't look at the 85 errors. as far as i can see it is only one. But thats a
Bamboo bug.
johan
On 1/22/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Johan
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WICKET2X-WICKET/latest
Ok, that one. I'll take a look at that tonight. Btw has anyone reported that
test count bug in bamboo?
Frank
yes:
http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/BAM-732
they say it is a maven error???
johan
On 1/22/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WICKET2X-WICKET/latest
Ok, that one. I'll take a look at that
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes:
http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/BAM-732
they say it is a maven error???
Yeah it looks like it. Have never seen it before. Take a look at the
attached file which is taken from the latest build.
I'll take a look at this as well
I already fixed it
The surefire plugin now uses a bit older version:
version2.1.3/version
And suddenly everything is cleaned up (see bamboo)
now really only one thing is failing.
johan
On 1/22/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe ok. I guess I'll fix it tonight is to late for you, huh? ;o)
Frank
On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already fixed it
The surefire plugin now uses a bit older version:
version2.1.3/version
And suddenly everything is cleaned up (see bamboo)
now really only one thing
it is strange isn't it
now you fixed it so it works on the server
and now i get the error:
---
Battery: wicket.markup.html.basic.SimplePageTest
On 1/15/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The licence header test fails. If you provide parameter
-Dmaven.test.skip=true, the project builds and works fine.
Frank, if you are reading this, wouldn't
licenseHeader = url.getFile();
work better than
licenseHeader = new
I personally think it is easer to override the init method of your application:
protected void init() {
super.init();
addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));
...
}
and use the @SpringBean where you want to use your DAO.
@SpringBean
Thanks Mats, I totally agree that that is a pretty clean option. This does
mean that you have to include wicket-spring and wicket-spring-annot though -
which I avoided.
I am trying to figure if the alternate approach is workable and then I do
feel it is worth adding to the wiki. Also it may be
Oops, sorry, didn't read your entire mail.
However, I do feel that the extra dependency is worth it in the long
run. You very seldom have only one DAO in your application... :) Let's
say you have 50 beans that you want to use in different parts of the
system, the code bloat in the Application
Thanks Mats, yes I agree.
I am also reporting (refer original message) that wicket-spring-annot is
broken for Maven 2 users, so at the moment I cannot use it even if I wanted
to. Can anyone comment on this?
Thanks,
Peter.
On 1/15/07, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops, sorry, didn't
The licence header test fails. If you provide parameter
-Dmaven.test.skip=true, the project builds and works fine.
Frank, if you are reading this, wouldn't
licenseHeader = url.getFile();
work better than
licenseHeader = new wicket.util.file.File(new
URI(url.toString())).readString(); ?
Hi,
I was thinking that more option can be added to the official wicket-spring
integration documentation. Something like this:
1) normal wicket servlet config in web.xml, with applicationClassName
init-param
2) Application class uses Spring API to get hold of dependency like this:
class
25 matches
Mail list logo
