For the author pages it is quite straight-forward. For the bibliographic
metadata the easiest would be to connect wikidata items with the Book:
page generated by the (planned) Book Manager extension. The Book: page is
supposed to provide the book structure and act as a metadata hub for both
About this:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Connecting new uploaded books with Wikidata: again this is very related to
the above. As a first preparatory step, one GsoC of this year worked on
using templates (like commons:Template:Book) directly with the
hi wikidata team!
im kisoong.jang from korea
nowdays i'm interested of wikidata.
I'm trying to make wikidata clone on my localhost at the moment
I've installed mediawiki, wikibase client wikibase repository successfully
and i downloaded whole dumps file in
Am 05.11.2013 01:12, schrieb David Cuenca:
Yes, that would be it: one work-item (acting as hub), x edition items
connected
to the work-item, each edition-item connected to its corresponding Wikisource
page with a sitelink and, on Wikisource, an auto-generated nav bar that lists
all sitelinks
** apologies for cross-posting **
Second Call for Workshops
http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/important-dates/call-workshops
The organizers of the 11th ESWC 2014 cordially invite you to submit a workshop
proposal. ESWC is a major venue for discussing the latest scientific results
and
Hello Antoine,
just to add to what was already said:
a Qualifier in Wikidata is not a statement about a statement. In RDF
semantics, the pattern that we follow is not the reification of the triple
and then to make triples with the reified triple as a subject, as per
Hi Antoine, all,
I was also a bit puzzled by this. If you want more discussion I there is stuff
on Gerard's blog [1,2].
After some patient explanations of the kind on this list, I think I understood
what qualifiers are about.
Still I disagree with a part of what Markus said. Trying to
Hi TomTOm,
Be careful what you wish for! If this were possible, then if someone changed
the dates, this could mess up other things. We already have a big job
untangling mismatched interwiki links, and this would make such mismatches
possible to the nth degree.
Jane
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 4,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:27:02 +0100, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:
About this:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Connecting new uploaded books with Wikidata: again this is very related
to
the above. As a first preparatory step, one GsoC of
Hoi,
The good news is that the interwiki tangles are a big improvement over what
we had. Now there is clarity when an interwiki is wrong. There is one place
where to solve it and when solved, it is solved for all linked Wikipedias.
The problem I have with all the ontology issues is that they are
10 matches
Mail list logo
