What you shouldn’t forget is try to think if you have all monuments.
In the Netherlands we started with the monuments on country level, now we are
working on monuments on municipal level. But there is also the ‘varend
erfgoed’, the boats that are monumental. So there can be a lot extra with
On 2 sep. 2015, at 13:46, Andre Koopal <an...@molens.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just as a reminder, do people have the helpdesk on commons on their watchlist
> ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments/Help_desk
> )? I just answered two question
Hi,
Just as a reminder, do people have the helpdesk on commons on their watchlist (
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments/Help_desk )? I
just answered two questions there.
Regards,
André
___
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing
Very quickly (I am at work), no, the original function should not be the
reason the object made it into the WLM list, the fact that it is a
'rijksmonument' and thus have a rijksmonument-id is the reason to make it
in the list.
Regards,
André
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jane Darnell
this is also the reason the object made it into
the Rijksmonument list to begin with (the reason it was chosen for heritage
status)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Andre Koopal an...@molens.org wrote:
Very quickly (I am at work), no, the original function should not be the
reason the object made
The common-scanning bot doesn’t need to work on new uploads. In principle you
can do a query to get all id’s where there is a picture for, that is easy
doable by query on the database, get the id’s without a picture from wikidata,
and then check if you have a match between the two. That is how
:00 Andre Koopal an...@molens.org:
The database it not down, and will be there until somebody does cleanup.
The database is not down no but it's going to be.
As erfgoedbot isn't running anymore, all the changes on the wikipédias are
not harvested into the database anymore (eg. in France, since
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
Від кого: Nicolas VIGNERON vigneron.nico...@gmail.com
Дата: 26 липня 2015, 21:28:24
2015-07-26 21:04 GMT+02:00 Andre Koopal an...@molens.org:
Hi,
I see a lot of discussion about how to get the data into wikidata. That is
good and needs to be done, but erfgoedbot did
Hi,
I see a lot of discussion about how to get the data into wikidata. That is good
and needs to be done, but erfgoedbot did a lot more.
Beside the harvesting (getting the list into the database), there were scripts
using the data. At least for the dutch competition, people who uploaded a
Via facebook I learned about:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about/news/eh-mobilise-volunteer-heritage-army/?utm_source=Hootsuiteutm_medium=Hootsuiteutm_campaign=Hootsuite%20Conversion
a project to survey grade II listed buildings via crowd sourcing.
Is the english team in contact with
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Platonides wrote:
On 06/09/13 02:13, Samat wrote:
It looks that the ID is still not required:
* upload without ID (without any desreption):
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Testimage.png
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:08:25PM +0300, Raul Kern wrote:
2012/9/30 Andre Koopal an...@molens.org:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 08:46:23PM +0200, Platonides wrote:
On 30/09/12 20:40, Andre Koopal wrote:
Does this work for pictures uploaded for WLM2012, or for all pictures on
commons tagged
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:30:33AM +, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
I saw that yesterday too
Anyone in there to hide that section?
Anybody with a confirmed account :-)
Done.
Regards,
Andre
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012, Karthik Nadar wrote:
Hi all,
just curious why information on
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:07PM +0200, Andre Koopal wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:30:33AM +, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
I saw that yesterday too
Anyone in there to hide that section?
Anybody with a confirmed account :-)
Done.
Hmm, that was only for the dutch main page
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 07:56:18PM +0200, Platonides wrote:
On 30/09/12 16:26, Cristian Consonni wrote:
Hi all,
I was wonder if it exist a tool that visualizes all the photos of a
given monument (i.e. a given ID), very much like this tool[*] but
fitered by ID and not by user.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:20:37PM +0300, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
Hi guys,
Do I understand correctly that a special uploader will be switched-off at
0:00 local time for each country?
No, the special uploader will stop to insert the wiki loves monuments
template at that time (or whatever
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 08:46:23PM +0200, Platonides wrote:
On 30/09/12 20:40, Andre Koopal wrote:
Does this work for pictures uploaded for WLM2012, or for all pictures on
commons tagged with a template.
Tried to lookup 'my' mill but that gives an empty set:
http://toolserver.org
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:59:42AM +0200, Lodewijk wrote:
Hi all,
* On QR codes: I know some people really fancy them... personally I think
that they wouldn't really look well in the existing designs at least on the
photo pages. Again: lets not make the process more complicated (these codes
Hi Emijrp,
On irc, you made a comment about the api being slow, can it be an idea
that for example nightly, you create the needed kml files for your mappings
from the database with a cron, and use that? That way, you get the fixes
from users as well, and people will see that more and more
NL btw?
Regards,
Andre
API is really slow for live use.
2012/9/4 Andre Koopal an...@molens.org
Hi Emijrp,
On irc, you made a comment about the api being slow, can it be an idea
that for example nightly, you create the needed kml files for your mappings
from the database
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0200, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in
Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version.
This issue is situational and all should not be ignored.
I personally always
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:17:17PM +0200, emijrp wrote:
2012/8/28 Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl
Hi Emilio,
Op 28-8-2012 10:35, emijrp schreef:
Hi, I'm making maps for WLM, if you need a map for your country and have
lists with coordinates, contact me
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:46:02PM +0300, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
Thanks a lot for adding our list. That's great!
I opened our templates in Kyiv list (see
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:51:55PM +0300, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
That page was only a test/concept. Please look at:
http://toolserver.org/~erfgoed/toolbox/
That is supporting translations by translatewiki, although still
development.
Veru nice, but I don't see UA in an upper
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:14:13PM +0300, Strainu wrote:
2012/6/28 Bas vb basvb_wikipe...@live.nl:
Some participants in the past have completed these 250 monuments routes in
ca. 2 ours, taking over 100 pictures an hour.
That sounds great for the WLM world record but horrible for the
I assume the table is number of monuments who don't have a picture yet.
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Santiago Navarro Sanz wrote:
I don't know the table has been done, but there are some Iberian cities with
more than 200 monuments. For example, Ciutadella in
I also don't think you should put limits.
In NL we have even discussed the other side. The pictures you normally
get are the outside pictures of the whole monuments and sometimes some
details. What you want as well, certainly from the bigger monuments is
a lot more detail pictures, inside and
What the previous years was done in NL is that each jurymember made his own
(small) set, that then the jury decided on.
What lodewijk describes seems to be a voting engine, but I think a selection
engine is nice as well. What I see for that:
- each jury member has his own list (starting out the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Sylvain Boissel wrote:
Hello,
We at Wikimedia France had some discussions about what we want to ask
potential (commercial) sponsors to fund, and what conditions we can accept
from them.
I know some discussion about this occured during the last
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:50:42PM +0100, Platonides wrote:
On 22/02/12 23:10, Lodewijk wrote:
THey are a Spanish Magazine, I guess it would be good if they have your
contact details for future communications :) Who knows when it comes in
handy. In any case there's no hurry - if not in
Hi,
A while ago I answered an OTRS ticket from somebody asking if they could
publish the pictures in their magazine, a spanish photo magazine. I
explained them the concept of free pictures, but also mentioned that
we would appreciate to see the article.
They just today responded with the pdf's
As it looks like final checks for the magazine, I have send a reply mentioning
that they say 2010, might be possible they can still change.
I also asked for a paper copy. Lodewijk: if they are willing, should it
be send to the dutch office, or is it better to have it send to
Wikimedia Spain?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:59:34AM +0100, Platonides wrote:
On 22/12/11 00:17, AleXXw wrote:
Hi there!
Is there any possibility for next year to make the wizard-ID-Field
prefillable over URL-parameter? We had prefilled upload-buttons in our
lists and it would be much better to link to
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Andre Koopal wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:59:34AM +0100, Platonides wrote:
On 22/12/11 00:17, AleXXw wrote:
Hi there!
Is there any possibility for next year to make the wizard-ID-Field
prefillable over URL-parameter? We had prefilled
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:44:43PM +0200, Strainu wrote:
2011/12/12 Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl:
Hi Strainu,
Hey,
So you want to find photos to add to the lists? We actually have such a
tool, but I kind of forgot to advertise it. Some examples:
That's great news.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:51:06PM +0100, Raimond Spekking wrote:
Hi all,
just a short note that I have uploaded 2 photos of our WLM evaluation in
Amsterdam on 2011-12-01.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WLM_Evaluation_Amsterdam-6097.jpg
I believe still every set of winners contains at least one mill :-)
A reminder to you and also to others to also add:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_Europe_nominee
to the nominated pictures?
Regards,
Andre
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:26:35PM +0100, Samat
Hi, I don't know if everybody reads the signpost, this is a nice essay
from emijrp, and it mentions Wiki Loves Monuments:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-10-24/Opinion_essay
Regards,
Andre
___
Wiki Loves Monuments
Hi,
For the WLM in the Netherlands I want to make statistics from how many
monuments somebody made a picture.
In principle the sql for this is simple:
SELECT img_user_text, COUNT(img_user) FROM image
JOIN page ON img_name=page_title
JOIN categorylinks AS clA ON page_id=clA.cl_from
WHERE
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:02:27AM +0200, Platonides wrote:
Andre Koopal wrote:
The query I grabbed counted just the number of pictures, while I needed
the number of monuments (unique id's).
Are they stored somewhere in the db? Otherwise, which template stores it?
I did the same kind
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:08:47PM +0300, Strainu wrote:
2011/10/3 Tomasz W. Koz??owski odder.w...@gmail.com:
I've removed the category from 273 pages listed there, but will need
to wait a couple of hours due to the lag at the Toolserver.
Thanks Thomas! Have you also been able to remove
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:51:52PM +0300, Strainu wrote:
Hi,
Do we have such a thing? If not could somebody with some artistic
talent make one?
On nl-wiki Silverspoon created one with my input:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MonumentenSter.svg
simple but effective I would say.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:55:12AM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
After stats, the charts!
This is all based on the API, which means each one of you can just use
the framework to build your own graphs. Results are 15min cached.
Hmm, apperently others are seeing things, but I get empty graphs at
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:57:33AM +0100, Nuno Tavares wrote:
Maarten, this has already been done, actually :(
But which sortkey field are you talking about?
The text after the | is in the database as a sortkey. As an example, the
following database query will give you the number of unique
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:42:44AM -0700, Romaine Wiki wrote:
I do not get it...
I watched this:
acesso ao somat??rio de todo o conhecimento humano. ?? isso o que
estamos a fazer.
Participe tamb??m: http://www.wikimedia.pt
Andre Koopal escreveu:
Hi Nuno,
Is this clear now? Otherwise can we perhaps have a chat on irc about it?
Regards,
Andre
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Jane Darnell wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Jane,
I just uploaded a file with the new upload wizard and I tried to see
Romaine's problem but couldn't.
Personally I don't see the problems at all, I think it will work fine
for the target audience and, because you
Has there been any update for this?
For NL we have the followonig statisticspage:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Erfgoed/Nederlandse_Erfgoed_Inventarisatie/RijksmonumentenTeller
That is done outsite the database at the moment by somebody else, but of
course all data is in
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Susana Morais wrote:
Hello all,
I have some questions. For the WLM competition we will ask the participant
to upload the photo with the ID number (he has previously seen in that great
list we have in our site :)). Then the photo will be automatically
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:08:38PM +0200, noorse w wrote:
Hm, where did Middelburg and Maastricht go? Only northern cities?
BR
noorse
In principle everything is open, but somebody local would need to pickup
organisation. The ones Bas mentioned are the ones were we know people
picked it up.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:24:47AM +0100, Susana Morais wrote:
Hello everybody,
We received an e-mail from someone interested in participating in the
contest, asking if it is possible to edit the photos (black and white,
sepia, etc). Has there already been some discussion about this?
In the
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Lodewijk wrote:
OK, just to clarify:
2011/7/22 Hubert hubert.la...@gmx.at
Am 22.07.2011 12:01, schrieb Lodewijk:
Hi Hubert,
thanks for summarizing your ideas. The actual situation will be a little
different most likely. I had a short
52 matches
Mail list logo
