Dear Wikimedia Colleagues:
As you may know, Annual Plan Grants are funds allocated to support an
organization’s annual plan to achieve mission objectives, and the Funds
Dissemination Committee (FDC) is a group of Wikimedians who make
recommendations to the WMF Board about Annual Plan Grant (APG)
I personally am more interested in transparency in general as a matter of
principle and as a matter of setting a good example from the top.
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
On 16 March 2015 at 21:20, Ilario Valdelli valde...@gmail.com wrote:
First question: can someone say me if there was a GLAM project managing
more than 4 languages?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/JoburgpediA
Second question: do you know a GLAM project managing material in
Thank you,
I have been unclear.
The question was more connected with the donation of content than with
creation of content.
An edit-a-thon can generate content in several languages, but an example
that can match what I am asking for is a donation of digitized documents
in several languages.
Sorry if address here two questions but I am collecting some data and I
would double check to supply the most accurate information.
First question: can someone say me if there was a GLAM project managing
more than 4 languages?
Second question: do you know a GLAM project managing material in
Agree, in that I found that the Board's minutes from last year, for the session
in which it eliminated the identification process for those administrators it
accords access to personally-identifiable identification of editors, were very
vague. Aside from the fact that SJ Carden moved to approve
