[Wikimedia-l] Re: [African Wikimedians] Invitation to episode 15 of WikiAfrica Hour

2022-08-30 Thread Festus Yemi
Thank you very much for this update. See you soon. Regards, Festus On Tue, Aug 30, 2022, 6:44 PM Ceslause Ogbonnaya wrote: > Dear Wikimedians, > > I'm delighted to invite you to episode 15 of WikiAfrica Hour, titled > *Wikimedians > In Residence*. > > The session is focused on shining light

[Wikimedia-l] Invitation to episode 15 of WikiAfrica Hour

2022-08-30 Thread Ceslause Ogbonnaya
Dear Wikimedians, I'm delighted to invite you to episode 15 of WikiAfrica Hour, titled *Wikimedians In Residence*. The session is focused on shining light on the marriage between Wikimedia and some host organisations and its members who are interested in a productive relationship with the

[Wikimedia-l] Re: [Small Wiki Toolkit] Writing Wikidata Queries Using WDQS Tool Workshop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC

2022-08-30 Thread Seyram Komla Sapaty
Hello, The workshop starts in 3 minutes! On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:57 AM Seyram Komla Sapaty wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a friendly reminder that the workshop > > starts in ~5

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread The Cunctator
I think the official WMF stance that it is functionally powerless is the wrong one to take. WMF should be much more aggressive, even if Google is a major donor to WMF. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022, 11:16 AM Nicholas Perry wrote: > As others mentioned in the thread, WMF can't enforce this directly as it

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread Nicholas Perry
As others mentioned in the thread, WMF can't enforce this directly as it is not the copyright holder. However, in past instances, we have raised the issue with Google (similar to the KPN example) and will do so for this one as well. I am meeting with Google later today and will flag this to

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread David Gerard
yep. Asking nicely is always the best first option, and WMF is good at that. Reusing our stuff is excellent, but correct licensing is important, and a link back would be very nice. On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 13:50, Gnangarra wrote: > Agree with Andy here, the WMF cant sue as the copyright holder,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread Gnangarra
Agree with Andy here, the WMF cant sue as the copyright holder, but they do have leverage and direct connections to Google to remind them of their obligations as a reuser to follow the copyright licensing and at the very least acknowledge the work from a Wikipedia. You'd think this would

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 10:18, Peter Southwood wrote: > If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves > do not > own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the text. They > can take > this up with Google, All of the above is true. > the WMF

[Wikimedia-l] Re: [Small Wiki Toolkit] Writing Wikidata Queries Using WDQS Tool Workshop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC

2022-08-30 Thread Seyram Komla Sapaty
Hello everyone, This is a friendly reminder that the workshop starts in ~5 hours time (UTC 16:00). Correction: The previous message pointed to the wrong etherpad doc. The correct link is

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread Ciell Wikipedia
We had a similar problem with the Dutch KPN interactive tv six years ago, and as members of the Dutch WP community contacted the tv provider KPN, who referred us to Metrological for the issue. Metrological has been very responsive and with the next update of the tv

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

2022-08-30 Thread Peter Southwood
If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves do not own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the text. They can take this up with Google, the WMF cannot. If you are one of those contributors you can approach Google as misusing your