[Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge

No, I'm saying it is opaque who of the 41-member comms department at WMF edits Diff. Standard practice even for non-profit publications is for the masthead to be public. On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 11:34 AM Antoine Musso wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:06 PM geni > >

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:06 PM geni > wrote: ... It has: https://diff.wikimedia.org/ ... Le 03/01/2023 à 15:32, The Cunctator a écrit : > Pretty amusing that it's incredible opaque who edits it. > Hello The Cunctator, I am

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge

Group accounts already there include: https://wikis.world/@WikiSignpost https://wikis.world/@wikisusdev https://wikis.world/@Wikimedia_Fr https://wikis.world/@WikiEducation https://wikis.world/@govdirectory https://wikis.world/@wikidata On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:34 AM The Cunctator wrote: >

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge

The wikipedia community doesn't need WMF permission to act on behalf of the community, imho. There are already a bunch of great wikipedians at the wikis.world instance - it would be a good place to set up some "official" accounts on behalf of the various wikipedia/wikimedia communities. On Sat,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge

Pretty amusing that it's incredible opaque who edits it. On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:06 PM geni wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 22:31, Erik Moeller wrote: > > These events, and Musk's capricious leadership, should be sufficient > > to make _any_ civil society organization begin to establish a