On 10 May 2014 19:02, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'll take a look at Faebot keeping
a table regularly synchronized on meta using the Google spreadsheets
API.
For anyone that may be interested in seeing which WMF employees have
what advanced permissions, there is now a wikitable on meta
Thanks so much for the help with this Fæ!
James Alexander
Legal and Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 May 2014 19:02, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'll take a look at Faebot keeping
a
On 10 May 2014 19:02, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/04/2014, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
...
we ask for a use case for every rights request, you can see most of them
here
I'm heading to bed but will follow up with you tomorrow from the office.
Publishing is on for that sheet at the moment (that's what I'm using to
show it through the link I gave) so not exactly sure what else you need but
I'd love if faebot was able to help keep it synced up on wiki.
Actually,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014, at 0:58, Isarra Yos wrote:
On 20/04/14 11:50, Liangent wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
Amir E. Aharoni, 20/04/2014 08:39:
Silly technical remark: Everybody, please stop doing this with
parentheses.
It
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Affiliation in username
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Isarra Yos wrote:
Removing the affiliation from
to add
affiliations at will but probably should have to request to have them
removed
Peter
- Original Message - From: Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Affiliation
Hence the suggestion that the user has to request removal.
Cheers,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Nathan nawr...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Affiliation in username
On Mon, Apr
On 04/21/2014 09:16 AM, Nathan wrote:
Do WMF accounts still get the staff usergroup?
Most accounts of staff and contractors do not get that usergroup: it is
a very highly privileged group that includes pretty much every
permission on every wiki, and access to it is on a strictly-needed basis.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 04/21/2014 12:07 PM, Nathan wrote:
Of the 120 staffers that don't have a staff account, how many have
accounts with (WMF) in the username - or accounts at all?
I honestly do not know the numbers, though I'd wager
It is so that there is (theoretically) no question when we are
operating as a staff versus operating as volunteers.
On Apr 21, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, interesting. I wonder why its necessary for most or all WMF staffers to
have accounts with an
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
wrote:
On 04/21/2014 12:07 PM, Nathan wrote:
Of the 120 staffers that don't have a staff account, how many have
accounts with (WMF) in the username - or
Hi James,
On 21 Apr 2014, at 19:16, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Philippe and I have worked hard to try and make the 'staff' user group as
it traditionally stands a very 'as needed' right and so the default is now
to give out no rights or smaller, more focused, rights (meta
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:16 PM, James Alexander
jalexan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
wrote:
On 04/21/2014 12:07 PM, Nathan wrote:
Of the 120 staffers
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Hi James,
On 21 Apr 2014, at 19:16, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Philippe and I have worked hard to try and make the 'staff' user group as
it traditionally stands a very 'as needed' right and so
On 21 Apr 2014, at 19:35, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Right now it's on a google doc because it is a public view of the tracking
spreadsheet Philippe and I use (which includes staff whose rights requests
were denied or removed as well as some contact info and additional
Silly technical remark: Everybody, please stop doing this with parentheses.
It breaks in right to left languages. Gary-WMF is just as readable, and
doesn't have this problem. Thanks for the attention.
בתאריך 20 באפר 2014 02:17, מאת Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm:
On a second thought, do we want
Amir, this is the first time that one's been brought up. I'll chat with
OIT about potentially changing moving forward.
pb
*Philippe Beaudette * \\ Director, Community Advocacy \\ Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc.
T: 1-415-839-6885 x6643 | phili...@wikimedia.org | :
Amir E. Aharoni, 20/04/2014 08:39:
Silly technical remark: Everybody, please stop doing this with parentheses.
It breaks in right to left languages. Gary-WMF is just as readable, and
doesn't have this problem. Thanks for the attention.
Your suggestion works against the built-in assumptions of
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
Amir E. Aharoni, 20/04/2014 08:39:
Silly technical remark: Everybody, please stop doing this with
parentheses.
It breaks in right to left languages. Gary-WMF is just as readable, and
doesn't have this problem.
On 20/04/14 11:50, Liangent wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
Amir E. Aharoni, 20/04/2014 08:39:
Silly technical remark: Everybody, please stop doing this with
parentheses.
It breaks in right to left languages. Gary-WMF is just as
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Isarra Yos wrote:
Removing the affiliation from the name itself and adding it as a group
would allow the mediawiki to format the name and group in a way that
makes sense for the given language. Keep to the parentheses for english
and such, do other things for ones where
On a second thought, do we want to add an optional affiliation field to the
signup form, so the affiliation goes at the end of username in braces?
- DGarry (WMF)
- Fred (DesignSolutionsInc)
- David (MIT)
- ...
So the signup form would look like this:
I hear where you're coming from, Gryllida. This only works if there is
some mechanism by which the affiliation can be confirmed. The (WMF)
affiliation is easily confirmed, and in fact anyone adding that affiliation
to their account name who isn't a WMF staffer gets blocked pretty quickly.
24 matches
Mail list logo
