[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

hwood) >> 2. Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license? (Ciell Wikipedia) >> 3. Re: [Small Wiki Toolkit] Writing Wikidata Queries Using WDQS Tool >> Workshop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC >> (Seyram Komla Sapaty) >> >> >> -- &g

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

ipedia) >> 3. Re: [Small Wiki Toolkit] Writing Wikidata Queries Using WDQS Tool >> Workshop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC >> (Seyram Komla Sapaty) >> >> ------------------ >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:18:53 +0200 >> From: "Peter Sou

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

Le 30/08/2022 à 17:47, The Cunctator a écrit : I think the official WMF stance that it is functionally powerless is the wrong one to take. WMF should be much more aggressive, even if Google is a major donor to WMF. Hello, When someone or an organization reuse the Wikipedia content without

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license? On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 10:18, Peter Southwood wrote: > If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves do not > own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the text. They ca

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

kipedia) >>3. Re: [Small Wiki Toolkit] Writing Wikidata Queries Using WDQS Tool >> Workshop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC >> (Seyram Komla Sapaty) >> >> >> -------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 30

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

hop On Tuesday, August 30th, 16:00 UTC > (Seyram Komla Sapaty) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:18:53 +0200 > From: "Peter Southwood" > Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Is G

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

yep. Asking nicely is always the best first option, and WMF is good at that. Reusing our stuff is excellent, but correct licensing is important, and a link back would be very nice. On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 13:50, Gnangarra wrote: > Agree with Andy here, the WMF cant sue as the copyright holder,

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

Agree with Andy here, the WMF cant sue as the copyright holder, but they do have leverage and direct connections to Google to remind them of their obligations as a reuser to follow the copyright licensing and at the very least acknowledge the work from a Wikipedia. You'd think this would

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 10:18, Peter Southwood wrote: > If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves > do not > own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the text. They > can take > this up with Google, All of the above is true. > the WMF

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

We had a similar problem with the Dutch KPN interactive tv six years ago, and as members of the Dutch WP community contacted the tv provider KPN, who referred us to Metrological for the issue. Metrological has been very responsive and with the next update of the tv

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Is GoogleTV violating Wikipedia's license?

If I understand the CC-by-sa licence correctly, Wikipedia and WMF themselves do not own the copyright, it is owned by the contributors who created the text. They can take this up with Google, the WMF cannot. If you are one of those contributors you can approach Google as misusing your