Nathan wrote:
Was that done so that anyone who wanted to know precisely which post
contained sensitive info would simply need to compare lists of posts
between the official archive and the various services that publicly
archive the list?
For reference:
Hi,
I can't access the supposed-to-be-public archive of wikimedia-l anymore (
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/).
What happened? Or I am doing anything wrong?
Best
Cornelius
Cornelius Kibelka
Twitter: @jaancornelius
Mobile:+351-91-9860232 (Vodafone PT)
German number
Hi Cornelius,
There is a bug about this at the moment, we're not completely sure what it
is yet because the settings on the interface side appear correct. You can
still see the archives at
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation however for now.
James
Bug:
Ah, thanks, James.
Best
Cornelius
Cornelius Kibelka
Twitter: @jaancornelius
Mobile:+351-91-9860232 (Vodafone PT)
German number currently offline
On 24 February 2014 21:36, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Cornelius,
There is a bug about this at the moment, we're
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under
request of a user who shared private information in February. Old links
are not broken and you can normally access the specific volumes:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-February/thread.html
Nemo
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under request
of a user who shared private information in February. Old links are not
broken and you can normally access the specific volumes:
Hear that sound?
That's the sound of a million data miners working to figure out what juicy
bit of info has been redacted.
Cheers,
Craig
On 25 February 2014 09:48, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under request
of a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.netwrote:
Hear that sound?
That's the sound of a million data miners working to figure out what juicy
bit of info has been redacted.
Cheers,
Craig
Found it: http://bit.ly/1fsZjVI
Did that reflect on gmane?
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, at 10:48, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under
request of a user who shared private information in February. Old links
are not broken and you can normally access the specific volumes:
Nathan, 25/02/2014 01:57:
Was that done so that anyone who wanted to know precisely which post
contained sensitive info would simply need to compare lists of posts
between the official archive and the various services that publicly
archive the list?
No, it was done so that people know what
10 matches
Mail list logo
