[Wikimedia-l] Re: ChatGPT and Wikipedia

2022-12-11 Thread Kim Bruning via Wikimedia-l
Hello Cuncutator, I think there's several lines of thought on this. On what theory would you argue that ChatGPT is violating Wiki[p|m]edia copyright? (If you've already posted reasoning elsewhere, or if someone else has posted an opinion you happen to agree with; I'd be happy to read a link as

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-20 Thread Kim Bruning via Wikimedia-l
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 02:48:12AM -0700, Lauren Worden wrote: > > They have, and LLMs absolutely do encode a verbatim copy of their > training data, which can be produced intact with little effort. > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10770.pdf > https://bair.berkeley.edu/blog/2020/12/20/lmmem/ My

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-02-20 Thread Kim Bruning via Wikimedia-l
FWIW YMMV, Executive Summary: == * I looked into Stable Diffusion recently. BEWARE: The actual technical and legal situation on the ground with these systems is VERY different from what -say- twitter will lead you to believe. Also :Everything you know will be wrong and out

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Joint Statement on Palestine

2024-04-12 Thread Kim Bruning via Wikimedia-l
Quick question, I'm not directly against what you're saying, but... How does this viewpoint align with NPOV, or the impression of NPOV? Would you think that "If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor" explicitly rejects a position of neutrality