How is that related to nova, what if we just enable it on existing
instances? If the network where the instances live on, support ipv6,
and instance get access to it, why it shouldn't work. It lives behind
kvm and if host system is on ipv6 network, we could just skip nova at
all, for now.
On Thu,
Netbrain posted a comment on MediaWiki.r114598.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114598#c32570
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114598:
added polygons parameter, can draw polygons on map
Netbrain's comment:
Something happened with git-svn merge so for some reason it was
Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote:
Also, I'm concluding based on Roan's objections that I'm going to have
a hard time convincing people to stop amending their commits. So I
wrote this script that provides changeset diffs for reviewers:
Robin - thank you for drafting this proposal! It's also helpful if you can
make the connection between your project and how its outcomes will benefit the
WM community. This resolves ABC problem that has come up. or Fulfills the
common request for XYZ feature that we currently don't have.
For
On 29/03/12 04:39, Chad wrote:
snip
-1/-2 of your own code is useful--it's great for This is a work in
progress, please do not merge yet but I'd like feedback
-2 it to be sure since it put a nice red cross ;-D
With Gerrit 2.3, we will be able to submit draft changes to polish them
before
Greetings Shivansh,
I've added your application to
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Summer_of_Code_2012_applications -
thank you for drafting it!
Hopefully others can review it and weigh in. My initial thought it is will be
helpful to focus on one or two ideas or features. I
Thank you very much Gregory.
In my application, I have reduced the ideas to 3, but I cant reduce any
other idea myself, and for that, I would need the Community's thoughts.
Thank you.
With Regards,
On 29 March 2012 18:21, Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Shivansh,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I agree. Having 'you' or 'i' makes the message personal when the focus
should remain on the commit itself.
+ 1
This patch needs improvement. | Needs improvement, this patch does. ( if
we go with the yoda job )
I've
On 03/29/2012 09:20 AM, Chad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I agree. Having 'you' or 'i' makes the message personal when the focus
should remain on the commit itself.
+ 1
This patch needs improvement. | Needs improvement, this patch does. ( if
2012/3/29 Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I agree. Having 'you' or 'i' makes the message personal when the focus
should remain on the commit itself.
+ 1
This patch needs improvement. | Needs improvement, this patch does.
It sounds better. Shame on your that you don't like Yoda
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I agree. Having 'you' or 'i' makes the message personal when the focus
should remain on the
Significantly slower today from Europe, graphs show a drastic drop at esams
http://is.gd/fKnluM and a raise on pmtpa http://is.gd/sowDb4
Can this be fixed?
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
+1 for There is a problem with this patchset, please improve.
Fix suggests you've broken something
(Yoda version would be Problem to be improved with this patchset there
is.) Does Gerrit support a yoda speak language... would make reviewing
even more fun ;-)?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:34 PM,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Significantly slower today from Europe, graphs show a drastic drop at esams
http://is.gd/fKnluM and a raise on pmtpa http://is.gd/sowDb4
Can this be fixed?
Peter restarted cp3001, things look much better now.
Roan
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1 for There is a problem with this patchset, please improve.
Alright, sounds good to me. Thanks for the input everyone.
I'll get this fixed soon.
-Chad
___
Wikitech-l mailing
Jpostlethwaite changed the status of Wikimedia.r1507 to fixme and commented
it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1507#c32571
Old Status: ok
New Status: fixme
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1507:
Further cleaning up trunk after the 4.1.1 upgrade - for some reason, these
Oren, check this out. Could you reach out to these researchers and tell
them to subscribe to this list if they haven't already? :-)
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21625-new-search-tool-to-unlock-wikipedia.html
New search tool to unlock Wikipedia - 28 March 2012 by Paul Marks
Khorn (WMF) posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1507.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1507#c32572
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1507:
Further cleaning up trunk after the 4.1.1 upgrade - for some reason, these
files were not deleted and should have been.
Khorn (WMF)'s
Aashish Mittal is working on a project proposal to facilitate books
for Wikisource/Wikibooks:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Aashish.mittal/GSoC_Application
Ashwini Kumar has this as one of several plans for a summer project:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Ashwini/GSOC_2012_Application
Jpostlethwaite posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1507.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1507#c32573
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1507:
Further cleaning up trunk after the 4.1.1 upgrade - for some reason, these
files were not deleted and should have been.
Jpostlethwaite's
cross-posting to wikitech-l
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I've been experimenting with the api that Max Semenik has been working
on and the html5 history interface [1] to add javascript to the
MobileFrontend extension so that any searches, link to
Bsitu posted a comment on MediaWiki.r113451.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/113451#c32574
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r113451:
PageTriage new tables, getMetaData API and database access file
Bsitu's comment:
yeah, we can use page id as the primary key. I just have
Hi,
Lot of volunteers are using email to communicate when they discuss
wikimedia related issues. Even if it's not a big problem to use
personal email there, lot of people, especially administrators do not
want to uncover their personal email. Lot of them even have a special
private mail for
The WMDE is giving out @wikipedia.de adresses, mine is f.e.:
mmovc...@wikipedia.de
Also, users with access to toolserver, have their Toolserver-Adresses,
mine is mmovc...@toolserver.org.
I think @wikimedia.org should only have staff of wikimedia. So
@wikipedia.org is a great idea.
--
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Lot of volunteers are using email to communicate when they discuss
wikimedia related issues. Even if it's not a big problem to use
personal email there, lot of people, especially administrators do not
want to uncover
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Michael Movchin mich...@movchin.de wrote:
I think @wikimedia.org should only have staff of wikimedia. So
@wikipedia.org is a great idea.
@wikipedia.org is similarly official-looking, I'm not sure that'll fly.
In the SVN days, Chad and I were toying with the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:41:12 -0700, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Lot of volunteers are using email to communicate when they discuss
wikimedia related issues. Even if it's not a big problem to use
personal email there, lot of people, especially administrators do not
want to uncover
On 29.03.2012, 23:50 Roan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Michael Movchin mich...@movchin.de wrote:
I think @wikimedia.org should only have staff of wikimedia. So
@wikipedia.org is a great idea.
@wikipedia.org is similarly official-looking, I'm not sure that'll fly.
It could be
Suggestion: git workshop and tutorial @ Hackathon Berlin 2012
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
+1
mglaser
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas Gries
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. März 2012 22:58
An: Wikimedia developers; Nicole Ebber
Betreff: [Wikitech-l] Hackathon Berlin 2012
+1
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote:
Suggestion: git workshop and tutorial @ Hackathon Berlin 2012
Anyone volunteering to run it?
-Chad
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
I'd run it.
— Patrick
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote:
Suggestion: git workshop and tutorial @ Hackathon Berlin 2012
Anyone volunteering to run it?
-Chad
Since we're still struggling with Git, Gerrit, and figuring out the
new work-flow, Sumana asked me to hold a triage on the the issues
people have filed in Bugzilla and then write this follow-up report.
I used the open blockers on #22596
Awesome. Just wanted to make sure someone could since I'm not there.
-Chad
On Mar 29, 2012 5:10 PM, Patrick Reilly prei...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'd run it.
— Patrick
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Gries
+1 for There is a problem with this patchset
(without , please improve).
I think that keeps it more neutral without saying anything the user doesn't
intend to say. It also keeps free ambiguity in the intention (to be
disambiguated
in a comment) between 'wontfix' and 'fixme'.
-- Krinkle
On Mar
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote:
Suggestion: git workshop and tutorial @ Hackathon Berlin 2012
Anyone volunteering to run it?
I'm willing to run it. I'm assuming Antoine and Brion will be
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1 for There is a problem with this patchset, please improve.
Alright, sounds good to me. Thanks for the input everyone.
I'll get this fixed soon.
Excuse me but it seems this seems to avoid the actual problem.
Although I know the answer for the most part, the question I think we should be
asking is more along the lines of Why are they using email
instead of on-wiki discussion threads?
I personally don't see a lot of gain in providing
I don't see a reason why it shouldn't look official
We are open source project not a part of government or something. So
usern...@wikipedia.org should be perfectly ok for established users,
who wouldn't abuse it just as sysop bit is. Also why not just let user
pick which domain they like?
On
On 29/03/12 00:10, Chad wrote:
Hi everyone,
There's been some comments that the phrasing for a -1 vote in
Gerrit (I'd prefer that you didn't submit this) is kind of personal
and we can do better.
I did some testing and this is totally configurable :) It won't change
for old comments that
I have posted a full proposal for my GSOC project. Please check it out
here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Blackjack48/GSOC_proposal_for_watchlist_improvements
Feedback and suggestions are welcome.
-Aaron
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
and going from nitpicker to
LEADER of nitpickers, we have some tasks ready for you. :D
* Mozilla has a regular testing event
https://quality.mozilla.org/category/events/month and lists bugs in an
etherpad as they're reported:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/testday-20120329 . Time-limited test
efforts
This is mostly a solution looking for a problem.
On Thursday, March 29, 2012, Petr Bena wrote:
I don't see a reason why it shouldn't look official
We are open source project not a part of government or something. So
usern...@wikipedia.org javascript:; should be perfectly ok for
established
Tim Starling posted a comment on MediaWiki.r83795.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/83795#c32575
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r83795:
Follow-up r83794, r83792: restore new SpecialBlock.php code from r83786. This
revision should *not* be broken :D
Tim Starling's
Tim Starling posted a comment on MediaWiki.r83810.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/83810#c32576
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r83810:
* Moved Target field validation into a field validation callback to show erros
next to the field
* Some changes to comments and one
46 matches
Mail list logo
