Just to add to this, this issue also exists for other pairs of codes (als/gsw,
bat-smg/sgs, and probably more).
Hazard-SJ
From: Hazard-SJ hazard...@yahoo.com
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
Hoi,
It is well known that Wikipedia uses incorrect codes as language codes. You
ask about Norwegian, no and Bokmal nb. There are two language Wikipedias
for Norwegian, one in Nynorsk the other Bokmal.
Both nn nb and no are valid codes as to the ISO-639-2. These codes should
NOT be used for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Hazard-SJ hazard...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just to add to this, this issue also exists for other pairs of codes
(als/gsw, bat-smg/sgs, and probably more).
Hazard-SJ
From:
Hey,
you're adding in a whole new set of incompatibilities.
How so?
Extensions that use any of these extension libaries now depend on the
version of MediaWiki and the version of the extension. That's a new set of
dependencies that can be incompatible now.
It adds a component as
Hi folks,
I'm constantly getting the following error on https://git.wikimedia.org/:
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /.
Reason: Error reading from remote server
/Alexander
Hey,
It's great that modules
like Diff have good beady eyes on code quality and portability, long may
that continue. That is *definitely* the exception, not the rule, with
extensions.
The point is that MediaWiki is *much* more likely to be able
to police and maintain that proper signature
I just noticed that ContentHandler has understandably deprecated several
hooks.
However, not all the hooks have been updated as deprecated on the mw.o.
Some of their replacements aren't even documented on mw.o.
Worse, there isn't any schedule for how long the legacy hooks are going
to be
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.comwrote:
What started this thread was Ryan having problems with installing Wikibase.
And I can see why this would not be all that smooth. The components you
need is probably not the biggest hassle. After all, you just need to
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
Are there any extensions that make use of this hook? Does
VisualEditor?
No, VisualEditor doesn't use this hook. Instead, it uses JavaScript to
insert edit links and/or modify existing ones. The editor itself is
Didn't we just decide on a deprecation setup a few months ago? Marked for
two majors then removed iirc
On Monday, July 22, 2013, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
I just noticed that ContentHandler has understandably deprecated several
hooks.
However, not all the hooks have been updated as
No, absolutely not. Do not remove something just because it has been
deprecated for two major versions.
-- Tim Starling
On 22/07/13 09:35, K. Peachey wrote:
Didn't we just decide on a deprecation setup a few months ago? Marked for
two majors then removed iirc
On Monday, July 22, 2013, Mark
I'm wondering if the lack of reactions so far is positive or negative. So
let me try to elicit more responses.
Here are three problems I see down the road.
1) A switch to MathML output will come with a performance loss.
Without a polyfill, rendering quality will be lost. With a polyfill,
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 15, 2013 - July 22, 2013
Status changes this week
Reports changed/set to UNCONFIRMED: 3
Reports changed/set to NEW: 17
Reports changed/set to ASSIGNED : 69
Reports
13 matches
Mail list logo