Hi,
I wish to add a hook on EditFilterMergedContent in my extension. I want to
use
the editpage object to call
editpage-spamPageWithContent()
I see that EditFilterMerged is also an option but it doesn't provides me
user, I also need the
User object.
Can anyone please help?
Cheers,
Anubhav
Tyler Romeo,
On Jul 23, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I hope that as few users as possible will
choose this way to degrade their experience and deprive the community of
their input.
Hi,
as a result of the discussion in [1] we now have a PATCH_TO_REVIEW
status in Bugzilla, which has replaced the patch-in-gerrit keyword.
The plan is to soon make Gerrit set this status automatically in a bug
report in Bugzilla (via the patch in [2]) when a patch mentions a bug
number (see the
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 12:03 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
we now have a PATCH_TO_REVIEW status in Bugzilla
Odder just pointed out on IRC that some bug reports may have vanished
from results of saved searches in Bugzilla, due to changing their status
to PATCH_TO_REVIEW which is not covered by these
Hi Risker,
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 14:22 -0400, Risker wrote:
A note about the bugzilla: there's a reason why people are commenting
there. They're being ignored in every other venue, and WP:CONEXCEPT
(exceptions to project consensus)[1] has been invoked in regard to this.
Therefore the
On 24 July 2013 21:12, Peter Krautzberger
peter.krautzber...@mathjax.org wrote:
..
@Oscar that's the idea of bug
48036https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48036 To
test the user experience try this
bookmarklethttps://gist.github.com/pkra/5500316
:-O
This is pretty. And if it
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Terry Chay tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Whoa. Them's fighting words! :-D
Yeah I'm sorry if that came off as aggressive, but this entire conversation
has had the air of the VE team has decided this, but maybe they'll be
gracious enough to compromise with you.
On Jul 25, 2013 6:18 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Terry Chay tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Whoa. Them's fighting words! :-D
Yeah I'm sorry if that came off as aggressive, but this entire
conversation
has had the air of the VE team has decided
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still wondering, when the call was made to disable this option, was it
expected this would cause massive resistance? If not, what is the WMF
planning to do to better judge that in the future (because imo
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For what it's worth, both the DOM serialization-to-a-string and DOM
parsing-from-a-string are done with the domino package. It has a
substantial test suite of its own (originally from
On Jul 25, 2013 8:02 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still wondering, when the call was made to disable this option, was
it
expected this would cause massive resistance? If not, what is the
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a de facto decision isn't it? Somebody figured flipping that switch
without discussing it with the wikis first was a good idea. The question
still stands: if they didn't expect this fall out, why not,
On Jul 25, 2013 8:09 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a de facto decision isn't it? Somebody figured flipping that
switch
without discussing it with the wikis first was a good idea. The
On 07/25/2013 01:03 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For what it's worth, both the DOM serialization-to-a-string and DOM
parsing-from-a-string are done with the domino package. It has a
substantial test suite of its own
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I find that somewhat hard to believe, but if it is true, should that worry
us? I'm not sure that we should be comfortable with changes like these not
giving pause to our engineers.
Well to be quite honest it
On 25 July 2013 14:20, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I find that somewhat hard to believe, but if it is true, should that
worry
us? I'm not sure that we should be comfortable with changes like
On 25 July 2013 11:00, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still wondering, when the call was made to disable this option, was
it
expected this would cause massive resistance? If not, what is the
On 25 July 2013 10:11, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still wondering, when the call was made to disable this option, was it
expected this would cause massive resistance? If not, what is the WMF
planning to do to better judge that in the future (because imo this was a
I made the call about a year ago, and mentioned it in several of the
dozens of mailing list and on-wiki posts made about the development of
VisualEditor since then. Clearly my communication about it wasn't read, or
wasn't understood, by the people who subsequently complained, but I
wouldn't
On 25 July 2013 11:32, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
The preference didn't break anything. It had been active for months during
the alpha testing. It was a conscious decision not to permit its
continued
use after the deployment on July 1, and the way that it was disabled was
by hiding
I have avoided getting involved so I could stay focused on fixing bugs and
making improvements to VisualEditor.
This thread has served it's purpose; to surface various arguments about
whether the preference to disable VisualEditor should be hidden or not. The
conclusion has been reached. The
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I have avoided getting involved so I could stay focused on fixing bugs and
making improvements to VisualEditor.
This thread has served it's purpose; to surface various arguments about
whether the preference to
I made the call about a year ago, and mentioned it in several of the
dozens of mailing list and on-wiki posts made about the development of
VisualEditor since then. Clearly my communication about it wasn't read, or
wasn't understood, by the people who subsequently complained, but I
wouldn't
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Subramanya Sastry ssas...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
And, both Roan and Scott are correct. Pathway 2. would be a test of of
external libraries (HTML5 and Domino, not just domino). And, we did have
bugs in the HTML5 parsing library we used (which I fixed based on
On 25 July 2013 15:45, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:23 PM, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
That's just flatly wrong. Removing the preference was always the
intention
and had been mentioned several times.
See here it is again. Was is
I am exploring around Varnish Cache, do you know some tools for test
performance and benchmarking?
Thanks,
Jacobo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Ok this is getting off-topic -- sorry -- but glad you like it :)
Unfortunately, webworker isn't an option, we need the DOM. Using the PNG
for size is an nice idea, but only saves one measurement, all others occur
within the equation. IIRC, the basic problem is that browser are not
reliable enough
Depends on what you want to do; but ab -- the apache benchmark -- isn't a
bad place to start.
~Matt Walker
Wikimedia Foundation
Fundraising Technology Team
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Jacobo Nájera jac...@metahumano.orgwrote:
I am exploring around Varnish Cache, do you know some tools
26 Июль 2013 г. 5:59:57 пользователь Jacobo Nájera (jac...@metahumano.org)
написал:
I am exploring around Varnish Cache, do you know some tools for test
performance and benchmarking?
Thanks,
Jacobo
https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/3.0/tutorial/increasing_your_hitrate.html
varnishtop -i
29 matches
Mail list logo
