What if it a bot builder builds one?
On 22 February 2015 at 10:35, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org
wrote:
What if a techie vandal builds a one-click disruption framework?
Il 15/02/2015 10:54, Petr Bena ha scritto:
I think it's pretty clear what I am proposing here :P there is a
Brian Wolff wrote:
Maybe the grant includes funds for hiring code review resources (ie
non-wmf people with +2. We exist!).
For what it's worth, you're exactly the type of person I would like to have
working at the Wikimedia Foundation. I love your posts here; thank you for
taking the time to
This, all of this.
On 21/02/15 21:26, Brian Wolff wrote:
However that's not a reason to have no IEG grants for tech projects
ever, its just a reason for code review to be specifically addressed
in the grant proposal, and for the grantee to have a plan. Maybe that
plan involves having a
Bináris wrote:
could we by any chance return to the conservative Netiquette way of
creating subjets, or the New Era of inadequate subjects has just begun,
and we trend to soil the list with these marketing-based whatnots? Shall
I go to the details or are we all informatics-minded people here?
Hi.
Thank you! The new glyphs look much better!
Il 21/02/2015 22:17, Max Semenik ha scritto:
Hi, this is a status update for my WikiHiero rewrite! [1]
I've made a first pass on comparison, based on all hieroglyphic texts on
English Wikipedia: [2]
You can see the difference yourselves, in my
What if a techie vandal builds a one-click disruption framework?
Il 15/02/2015 10:54, Petr Bena ha scritto:
I think it's pretty clear what I am proposing here :P there is a real
problem and this is a real solution. Regarding vandals would have fun
with that I think you are over estimating them,
I agree with Pine. The way I read the IEG strictures was that they would
reject projects that required might need any code review at all; whether
that's true or not it definitely discourages some projects that might be
really useful.
As it stands, most of the projects I read through in the last
Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com writes:
Politically, I think its dangerous how WMF seems to more and more
become the only stakeholder in MediaWiki development.
We do have the MediaWiki Stakeholders group. The people involved there
would argue that they have funded MediaWiki-focused development.
[[m:Synchbot]] is what you are looking for.
-Revi
[[User:-revi]]
-- Sent from Android --
2015. 2. 21. 오후 5:56에 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emi...@gmail.com님이 작성:
2015-02-21 8:45 GMT+01:00 Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com:
Is it necessary to request deletion of a local user page in order to get
Could we get uploading privileges allowed for normal users (such as myself)
on meta? Otherwise profile photos will require special privileges.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Hong, Yena li...@revi.pe.kr wrote:
[[m:Synchbot]] is what you are looking for.
-Revi
[[User:-revi]]
-- Sent from
Am 21.02.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Marielle Volz:
That's what I was going to do originally, but then I looked at my profile
picture on en wiki[1] I saw this message:
Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.
While the license of this image or media file, uploaded and used on (a)
Wikipedia
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada wrote:
It seems so. In my case, I created years ago a lot of redirects to my
English userpage from many Wikipedia languages, and now I have to request
the deletion for all them. Not very useful.
Not very useful is a slightly rude comment to make, in my opinion. You
2015-02-21 8:45 GMT+01:00 Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com:
Is it necessary to request deletion of a local user page in order to get
the global page to be automatically transcluded?
Pine
It seems so. In my case, I created years ago a lot of redirects to my
English userpage from many Wikipedia
Hi Everyone,
just wanted to quickly let you know that MediaWiki will verify that
extensions register all rights they define in $wgAvailableRights (or
using the UserGetAllRights hook).
To make sure your extension complies with that just add all the rights
your extension defines to
On 21/02/15 15:21, MZMcBride wrote:
Instead of deletion, blanking the user page might be a neat way of
triggering the global user page to re-appear (a version of pure wiki
deletion). Though, of course, some users might want a 0-byte user page.
With interface messages, setting the content to
On 21-02-2015 12:14, Marielle Volz wrote:
Could we get uploading privileges allowed for normal users (such as myself)
on meta? Otherwise profile photos will require special privileges.
We have Commons for that. Meta does not allow non-free or fair-use
images anyway.
Regards,
--
Erwin Dokter
That's what I was going to do originally, but then I looked at my profile
picture on en wiki[1] I saw this message:
Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.
While the license of this image or media file, uploaded and used on (a)
Wikipedia contributor(s) user page(s), may be compliant with
Hoi,
When the local language is not among the selected languages, it helps to
show a level 0 for the local language.
What do you think, is this feasible ??
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 February 2015 at 20:32, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This is awesome! When do we get a global
Hi,
I just found out that w3c has an editing task force, which tries to address
the nightmare that is contenteditable:
http://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/tf-charter.html
Does Wikimedia participate in it in any way?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On 21-02-2015 13:14, Marielle Volz wrote:
That's what I was going to do originally, but then I looked at my profile
picture on en wiki[1] I saw this message:
Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.
[...]
I took that to mean that profile pictures in general were discouraged from
being
Well, image upload for userpage use is explicitly permitted on Commons[1],
as long as it is used and copyright status is fine. (To get meta uploader
right, you need a clear use case, and it is rarely given. Meta does not
allow EDP (fair use), so if it is fair use, it cannot be hosted on Commons
(Now continuing this discussion on Wikimedia-l also, since we are
discussing grant policies.)
For what it's worth, I repeatedly advocated for allowing IEG to support a
broader range of tech projects when I was on IEGCom. I had the impression
that there was a lot of concern about limited code
Hi, this is a status update for my WikiHiero rewrite! [1]
I've made a first pass on comparison, based on all hieroglyphic texts on
English Wikipedia: [2]
You can see the difference yourselves, in my opinion the general quality is
considerably better, and far more hieroglyphs are supported.
On 2/21/15, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
(Now continuing this discussion on Wikimedia-l also, since we are
discussing grant policies.)
For what it's worth, I repeatedly advocated for allowing IEG to support a
broader range of tech projects when I was on IEGCom. I had the impression
that
On 2/21/15, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
In general WMF has a conservative grant policy (with the exception of IEG,
grant funding seems to be getting more conservative every year, and some
mission-aligned projects can't get funding because they don't fit into the
current molds of the
25 matches
Mail list logo
