Can I just agree with everything Brian just said?
+1 :)
Am 08.04.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Brian Wolff:
To be nitpicky, not only is it possible to combine rc with wikipages,
its
been supported (and mostly unused) for ages in the form of
special:recentchangeslinked. More structured lists could be
To be nitpicky, not only is it possible to combine rc with wikipages,
its
been supported (and mostly unused) for ages in the form of
special:recentchangeslinked. More structured lists could be done with
content handler (as with all things there are pros and cons to such an
approach).
2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com:
Things that come to my mind:
*range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals are
using near by ips
*cant do a whois on the ip to see if its a library or something
Oh, I didn't think about this!
What about:
*
I hope no 60 storey building is in the making. The bazaar is horizontal,
a vertical suk is too similar to a cathedral.
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
2015-04-08 16:11 GMT+02:00 Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com:
What about:
* creating a new permission group (say IP watchers) that can see the
IP in non-hashed form?
* compile some sort of list and automatically tagging edits from
schools and libraries? (this could be useful
On Apr 8, 2015 11:12 AM, Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com
wrote:
Cristian Consonni schreef op 2015/04/08 om 3:00:
2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com:
Things that come to my mind:
*range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals
are
Thanks for bringing this up!
There was an outage of s2 wikis.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95426 is the related task and will
get updated with any findings.
An incident report will be made available at
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incident_documentation once
investigation has
Nope, it's working for me.
Maybe a temp problem, have you asked on #wikimedia-operations?
Freundliche Grüße / Best
Florian Schmidt
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: [Wikitech-l] Too many connections...
Datum: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:29:57 +0200
Von: Ilario Valdelli valde...@gmail.com
An:
I haven't seen this myself, but there're some reports about the same
problem in the village pump of zhwiki.
-Liangent
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de
florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de wrote:
Nope, it's working for me.
Maybe a temp problem, have you asked on
Sorry, are you experiencing the same problem than me accessing to the
Italian Wikipedia?
Sorry! This site is experiencing technical difficulties.
Try waiting a few minutes and reloading.
(Cannot access the database: Too many connections (10.64.32.30))
--
Ilario Valdelli
Wikimedia CH
Verein
I confirm that for 15-20 minutes Italian Wikipedia has been unavailable and
I checked with other sysops of it.wikipedia.
Regards
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:00 PM, florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de
florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de wrote:
Nope, it's working for me.
Maybe a temp problem, have
Cristian Consonni schreef op 2015/04/08 om 3:00:
2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com:
Things that come to my mind:
*range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals are
using near by ips
*cant do a whois on the ip to see if its a library or something
Well, let's be honest. Whatever the theories behind it, these are content
pages, they aren't mini-watchlists or really anything even all that
technically related to the watchlist wishlist. Content belongs in a
content space. Whether it gets its own wikispace, or it uses userspace, is
sort of
On Apr 8, 2015 2:59 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
The main motivation for lists as not being wikipages is so that they
can be combined with the recent changes feed and other things stored
in the database.
To be nitpicky, not only is it possible to combine rc with wikipages, its
I think the explicit schema will be brilliant when applied to collections,
it will facilitate linking tools and more. But would it make sense to
represent lists as a wikidata statements, as a compromise between native
SQL and wiki pages? We would gain the standard onwiki tools, a data
structure
A patch [0] was merged recently that moves files provisioned by some
roles from /srv/* (and /vagrant/*) to /vagrant/srv/*. This puts the
files on the host machine and reduces the number of random
subdirectories under /vagrant that are created. See T89919 [1] and the
patch for more details.
Most
The main motivation for lists as not being wikipages is so that they
can be combined with the recent changes feed and other things stored
in the database. We'll also hoping to support the filtering of
collections via tags which becomes much easier if stored in a
database. A watchlist is not a
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:17:44 +0200, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
A watchlist is not a wikipage, so that in my eyes sets a
precedent.
Its also unequivocally private. I think a lot of the conflict here comes
from the dual nature of gather as public/private.
I think a closer precedent
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 2015 2:59 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
The main motivation for lists as not being wikipages is so that they
can be combined with the recent changes feed and other things stored
in the database.
To
On 8 apr. 2015, at 21:17, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the problem is one of integration. People want anything publically
editable to be consistent. Earlier in this thread TheDJ made a comparison
to building an office tower with duct tape. Well he has a fair point about
20 matches
Mail list logo
