Re: [Wikitech-l] Arbitrary Wikidata querying

2016-12-10 Thread Gergo Tisza
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 5:30 PM, MZMcBride wrote: > A more advanced form of this Wikidata querying would be dynamically > generating a list of presidents of the United States by finding every > Wikidata item where position held includes "President of the United > States". Is

Re: [Wikitech-l] Arbitrary Wikidata querying

2016-12-10 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
AFAIK, you can query data from Wikidata, but you cannot put it into a page, unless its a graph. Graphs can do it - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Graph/Demo/Sparql As of last Thursday, you can also create a table on Commons Data namespace, and make a simple Lua script on your favorite

[Wikitech-l] Arbitrary Wikidata querying

2016-12-10 Thread MZMcBride
Hi. If I wanted to make a page on the English Wikipedia using wikitext called "List of United States presidents" that dynamically embeds information from and and other similar items, is this currently possible? I consider

Re: [Wikitech-l] Deploying the Linter extension to Wikimedia wikis

2016-12-10 Thread MZMcBride
Legoktm wrote: >>Does the extension distinguish between errors and warnings? Are there >> gradations of errors? For example, deprecated syntax v. invalid syntax? > >Not really. Each category has a name like "obsolete-tag" or >"bogus-image-options", and that's about it. There's now

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread Tim Landscheidt
Cyken Zeraux wrote: > Public logging isn't very accessible. When you join in a chat after being > disconnected (like IRC does all the time), you'd like to look through the > previous discussions easily. > […] For ERC, I have the sniplet: | (defun erc-cmd-TODAYSLOG nil |

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread John
Depends on how you define easy. http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23mediawiki/ is a recording of everything in #mediawiki by date, oldest at the top, newest at the bottom. I would consider that fairly easy. On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Cyken Zeraux wrote: > Public

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread Cyken Zeraux
Public logging isn't very accessible. When you join in a chat after being disconnected (like IRC does all the time), you'd like to look through the previous discussions easily. On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:30 PM, John wrote: > An issue was raised about only seeing IRC

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread John
An issue was raised about only seeing IRC messages while logged in, however the WMF does publicly log several of their channels, so that is a moot point ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread Cyken Zeraux
A lot of places are using Discord now, too. It has an offline, mobile, and web client that are more media based, so there's multiple channels and support for direct files/images uploads. I think it would make it a lot easier to actually have a chat platform you can interact with other people in.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Dan Garry
On 10 December 2016 at 01:25, Pine W wrote: > Surprise UI changes could, for example, result in thousands of dollars' > worth of instructional videos becoming instantly out of sync with the > real-world user experience. Given the incredibly minor nature of this change (as

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread bawolff
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:44 AM, MAYANK JINDAL wrote: > Hi, > The problem is in IRC that it doesn't allow to see previous messages. > I mean it only shows messages as long as you are logged in. > This isn't really a new problem. Some people use bouncers [1] to solve

Re: [Wikitech-l] Discussion Platform

2016-12-10 Thread MAYANK JINDAL
Hi, The problem is in IRC that it doesn't allow to see previous messages. I mean it only shows messages as long as you are logged in. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:20 PM, MAYANK JINDAL wrote: > Hi, > We are using IRC for discussion purpose. How will it be if we change

Re: [Wikitech-l] Introduction for Gsoc 2017

2016-12-10 Thread bawolff
>> > > In regards to 3: >> 3. What are the other things that happen apart from GSoC(In case if I wish >> to contribute even after Gsoc. How is the culture of this >> community? > > You are welcome to contribute at any time. You do not need to be part > of a program to do so. The other

Re: [Wikitech-l] Introduction for Gsoc 2017

2016-12-10 Thread bawolff
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 6:50 AM, MAYANK JINDAL wrote: > Hi , > Hope you are doing well. > I want to discuss my preparation for Gsoc-2017 in Wikimedia. I am very new > to this organization and I am facing a lot of difficulties in getting > Wikimedia workflow. > 1. I have

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 12:57 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Is there any reason security has been changed on this file? > > I don't understand or see where "security" (?) was changed. Mea culpa. I should have read all the other messages in this noisy thread first. :-/ Indeed, "Phabricator keeps

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 19:49 +1000, K. Peachey wrote: > On 10 December 2016 at 19:07, Gergo Tisza wrote: > > > > For reference, these are the changes being discussed: > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5022813 > > Is there any reason this is being discussed on a File compared to a task? Did

Re: [Wikitech-l] Introduction for Gsoc 2017

2016-12-10 Thread MAYANK JINDAL
Hi , Hope you are doing well. I want to discuss my preparation for Gsoc-2017 in Wikimedia. I am very new to this organization and I am facing a lot of difficulties in getting Wikimedia workflow. 1. I have done open source contributions in past and what I have seen is - They have their repositories

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Strainu
2016-12-10 12:48 GMT+02:00 Amir Ladsgroup : > I just want you to stop there > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM Strainu wrote: > >> That's one way to put it. I would rather say that we reacted to yet >> another slip-up in communication from the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Amir Ladsgroup
I just want you to stop there On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM Strainu wrote: > That's one way to put it. I would rather say that we reacted to yet > another slip-up in communication from the Foundation. Why is it so > hard for you guys to push the information to wikis? > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Strainu
2016-12-10 11:07 GMT+02:00 Gergo Tisza : > For reference, these are the changes being discussed: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5022813 > > > 1) Significantly larger changes than this are happening all the time (the > OOUI-ification of old forms, for example), without

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Gergo Tisza
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Amir Ladsgroup wrote: > It returns permission error to me > Uh, fixed. Looks like Phabricator keeps files private as long as they are not associated to any task. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread K. Peachey
On 10 December 2016 at 19:07, Gergo Tisza wrote: > For reference, these are the changes being discussed: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5022813 Is there any reason this is being discussed on a File compared to a task? Is there any reason security has been changed on

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Amir Ladsgroup
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:37 PM Gergo Tisza wrote: > ​For reference, these are the changes being discussed: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5022813 > > It returns permission error to me ___ Wikitech-l mailing list

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes in colors of user interface

2016-12-10 Thread Gergo Tisza
​For reference, these are the changes being discussed: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5022813 1) Significantly larger changes than this are happening all the time (the OOUI-ification of old forms, for example), without anyone noticing, so it's pretty clear people are reacting to the