Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-29 Thread Robert Rohde
Okay. Thanks for making the extra effort. -Robert On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:05 AM, MZMcBride wrote: > Robert Rohde wrote: > >Which, after substituting "display:none;" I think translates directly to > >the regex search: > > > >insource:/style[ ]*=[ ]*\"display:[ ]*none;[

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-28 Thread MZMcBride
Robert Rohde wrote: >Which, after substituting "display:none;" I think translates directly to >the regex search: > >insource:/style[ ]*=[ ]*\"display:[ ]*none;[ ]*\"/i > >That gives me 487 articles. Almost, but not quite. You actually want this: insource:/style[ ]*=[ ]*\"display:[ ]*none;?[

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-27 Thread Robert Rohde
I'm not sure what your bug is, but those counts are way too high to be accurate reflections of the wikitext in the main namespace on enwiki. -Robert Rohde On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:13 AM, MZMcBride wrote: > Hi. > > I was curious about the prevalence and types of inline

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-27 Thread MZMcBride
Robert Rohde wrote: >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:13 AM, MZMcBride wrote: >>The following are the top ten instances of inline styling from main >>namespace pages on the English Wikipedia, as of about 2015-10-02: >> >>1552197 text-align: center; >>499756 text-align: left;

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-27 Thread Robert Rohde
Okay, I misunderstood those as page counts, which would be way too high. Even if they are explicit usage counts, I am still surprised they are that high. BTW, is it surprising to anyone else that style elements aren't searchable by default? Searching for "efcfff" [1], gives only a single article

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-27 Thread Trey Jones
It appears that the summary may have normalized the formatting of the CSS. 143095 display: none; Your query[1] assumes a space after "display:" and gives 218 results. Using no space[2] gives 2,473 results, but still assumes that no other elements occur in the style attribute. A regex query[3]

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-27 Thread Robert Rohde
As I read it MZMcBride's code [1] used the pattern, pattern = r'style[ ]*=[ ]*"(.+?)"' and then normalized the internal spaces. Which, after substituting "display:none;" I think translates directly to the regex search: insource:/style[ ]*=[ ]*\"display:[ ]*none;[ ]*\"/i That gives me 487

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-26 Thread MZMcBride
Daniel Friesen wrote: >Perhaps some deeper segregation of those stats would be useful. ie: >Separate the numbers of styles used between templates and pages. > >Then we might have a better idea of what kind of patterns are being used >directly in pages that should actually be moved to templates or

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-26 Thread Daniel Friesen
On 2015-10-26 8:15 PM, MZMcBride wrote: > Daniel Friesen wrote: >> Perhaps some deeper segregation of those stats would be useful. ie: >> Separate the numbers of styles used between templates and pages. >> >> Then we might have a better idea of what kind of patterns are being used >> directly in

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-26 Thread Vi to
Do you have a old dump to check whatever the ratio has increased? Vito 2015-10-26 4:27 GMT+01:00 MZMcBride : > K. Peachey wrote: > >Is this direct usage of the styling, or does it include styling introduced > >by templates as well? > > Just direct usage of styling,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-25 Thread K. Peachey
Is this direct usage of the styling, or does it include styling introduced by templates as well? On Monday, October 26, 2015, MZMcBride wrote: > Hi. > > I was curious about the prevalence and types of inline styling (or more > specifically, inline CSS) in articles on the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-25 Thread MZMcBride
K. Peachey wrote: >Is this direct usage of the styling, or does it include styling introduced >by templates as well? Just direct usage of styling, specifically anything approximately matching 'style="[...]"'. The script only looked at the wikitext directly used in pages as that's what's provided

Re: [Wikitech-l] Audit of inline styling in the main namespace of the English Wikipedia

2015-10-25 Thread Daniel Friesen
On 2015-10-25 8:27 PM, MZMcBride wrote: > K. Peachey wrote: >> Is this direct usage of the styling, or does it include styling introduced >> by templates as well? > Just direct usage of styling, specifically anything approximately matching > 'style="[...]"'. The script only looked at the wikitext