Thanks for the responses guys. We'll take this into consideration for
future development and testing.
--Shawn
On 3/29/14, 12:59 AM, Liangent wrote:
No they were deliberately made not cached because otherwise in the event
that some sensitive data got oversighted, they may still keep
Hi,
As part of our extension testing, we've set up varnish in accordance
with http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Varnish_caching
One of the things we've noticed is that our oldid URIs are cached,
whereas Wikipedia doesn't seem to cache those pages.
Is there a reason why Wikipedia doesn't
On 3/28/14, Shawn Jones sj...@cs.odu.edu wrote:
Hi,
As part of our extension testing, we've set up varnish in accordance
with http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Varnish_caching
One of the things we've noticed is that our oldid URIs are cached,
whereas Wikipedia doesn't seem to cache those
No they were deliberately made not cached because otherwise in the event
that some sensitive data got oversighted, they may still keep accessible
from cached data, and there are even no way to have them go away.
On Mar 29, 2014 11:40 AM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/14, Shawn
