Thanks!
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:03, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the clarification.
>
> User is still in -tech channel. I've looked through the Phab Admin list
> and it looks like most are US/Canda based so they might be best waiting
> until later.
>
> Thanks for the help
>
> On
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 09:55 +0100, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote:
> Do we know when it was implemented and why? Is it part of the
> response to earlier security issues?
Yes.
Best place to bring up Phabricator questions is
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Phabricator/Help
which is linked from the
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
User is still in -tech channel. I've looked through the Phab Admin list and
it looks like most are US/Canda based so they might be best waiting until
later.
Thanks for the help
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 09:59, K. Peachey wrote:
> It's been used on and off as
It's been used on and off as required for the past few years.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 18:55, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote:
>
> Do we know when it was implemented and why? Is it part of the response to
> earlier security issues?
>
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 09:51, K. Peachey wrote:
>>
>> It's a
Do we know when it was implemented and why? Is it part of the response to
earlier security issues?
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 09:51, K. Peachey wrote:
> It's a anti-spam measure, One of the Phab administrators will approve
> when available.
>
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 18:28, RhinosF1 Wikipedia
>
It's a anti-spam measure, One of the Phab administrators will approve
when available.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 18:28, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Is there any reason Phabricator accounts would be marked not approved?
> I've not noticed this happening before but there's been a report on
Hi all,
Is there any reason Phabricator accounts would be marked not approved?
I've not noticed this happening before but there's been a report on IRC
(see
https://wm-bot.wmflabs.org/logs/%23wikimedia-tech/20190404.txt) by
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Dusti/ saying they are getting the
