On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I can understand the rationale behind removing jQuery.browser:
apparently most developers are too stupid to be trusted with it. Maybe
the idea is to use per-project reimplementation of jQuery.browser as
an intelligence
On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:17 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I can understand the rationale behind removing jQuery.browser:
apparently most developers are too stupid to be trusted with it. Maybe
the idea is to use per-project reimplementation of jQuery.browser as
an intelligence
Hi Timo,
2012/11/7 Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com:
Just a reminder that jQuery will (after almost 4 years of deprecation!) drop
$.browser [1] in jQuery 1.9.
Thanks for the reminder: it was still used in the MediaWiki:Commons.js
of the French Wikipedia.
What frightens me a bit is that I've been
On 07/11/12 13:09, Krinkle wrote:
In most (if not all) cases of people using $.browser it is because they want
different behaviour for browsers that don't support a certain something.
Please
take a minute to look at the code and find out what it is you are
special-casing
for that
On 7 November 2012 03:09, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
..
== Feature detection
In most (if not all) cases of people using $.browser it is because they want
different behaviour for browsers that don't support a certain something.
Please
take a minute to look at the code and find out
Hey all,
Just a reminder that jQuery will (after almost 4 years of deprecation!) drop
$.browser [1] in jQuery 1.9.
Please check your scripts and make sure you are are no longer using $.browser
(or jQuery.browser). After jQuery 1.9 is released, from the next MediaWiki
deployment after that
