I did some Lion testing yesterday on our 802.1X secured SSID and
discovered the following while watching the RADIUS logs:
The laptop had two accounts set up on it, mine and another 'tester'. If
you simply switched users the machine would reauthenticate but still use
the other
In your test machine… How did you create your 802.1x profile?
dp
Daniel Palmer
University Technology Services (UTS)
Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322
404.727.5297 (office)
404.213.1643 (mobile)
From: David Blahut dabla...@vassar.edumailto:dabla...@vassar.edu
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless
Philippe,
We have done some testing in the past on 10.5 and early 10.6, and found that
when 802.1x was enabled, we were unable to connect to another SSID on the
network until 802.1x was turned off.
That stopped us from being able to use our Xpressconnect to do this. Have
you had any experience
Great question, I was surprised to not see the + in the 802.1X window.
When I associated to the secure SSID a dialog box popped up asking for
username and password. I think the credentials are added to the keychain
at that point.
You can also use Lion server to create a profile. I haven't
That was going to be my point. That profile can be for the user or for the
machine. We are using a user based profile that we modify via script and
slurp in to create our connection. (Cannot say which id is being used to
validate though, have not had time to test that).
dp
Daniel Palmer
Hi all,
We have a Cisco 4402 WLC that we've been running for a while with no
major issues. The code we're running is 6.0.182.0 and figured perhaps
it's time to upgrade prior to the school year. As nothing on the Cisco
web-site is labelled GD, I was looking for recommendations for a
All,
I used the iPhone configuration utility to create a .mobileconfig file, as
recommended by apple. Upon double-clicking, it prompts to install the profile,
and you can optionally enter a username and password at that time. Either once
you enter those and finish profile installation, or if
We have 7.0.98.0 running on six 4404's and five 5508, since late April
with no problems. Go for it!
*Art*
*Art Ripley*
/Network Administrator/
_OBERLIN _
*Oberlin College
Irvin E. Houck Center for Information Technology
Mudd 029 D
173 West Lorain Street
Oberlin,OH 44074*
office. 440.775.8784
We are in the midst of testing a setup portal for admission to our dot1X
SSID. It is
a typical portal setup, with a captive DNS that points the web browser at the
portal web
page, with explanations of how to connect and items to download (evaluating
XpressConnect now for this).
It works fine
We have 24 Cisco WiSMs with 2,500+ APs running 7.0.98.218 for 93+ days without
any problem. This is the 7.0.98.0 code plus fixes. A couple of minor issues we
saw with 7.0.98.0 went away with the .218 code.
We run the following Cisco LWAPPs, and a handful of IOS 1242AGs at two small
remote
I've found 7.0.116.0 to be very stable, I've been happily running it since late
April on 7 WiSMs and 1 4400 series with no issues, and since late May on two
WiSM 2s. It also incorporates some new features not found in 7.0.98.218. As
for APs we've got a mix of 1131AG, 1142N, and 3502i for
Had been running 7.0.98 for a year+, just recently migrated all controllers
(13 w/~1.3K APs) to 7.0.116 - so far so good.
Afterwards I'd heard that multiple Lion clients that had been having
connectivity issues (while under 7.0.98) saw the problem vanish, but that's
all suspect without
I had a lot of trouble with MAC clients when I upgraded to 7.0.98.0, that went
away when I upgraded to 7.0.98.209. My MAC computers would have intermittent
connection issues, and nothing worthwhile was logged. It started immediately
after upgrading to 7.0.98 and went away immediately after
We have upgraded three wism modules from 7.0.98 to 7.0.116 for about one month
and we haven't seen any issues. The upgrade fixed some connectivity issues for
MacBook. The TAC engineer couldn't identify the MacBook connectivity issue as a
bug but the upgrade did fix it.
---
Dennis Xu
Network
14 matches
Mail list logo
