Re: The HTML5 process is fair

2008-11-24 Thread Julian Reschke
Dean Edridge wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: Do we really need this discussion? No, we don't, because I think we've already established that things aren't as bad as you once thought. ... The only thing we've worked out is that things aren't as bad *for you* as *you* once thought. I

Re: The HTML5 process is fair

2008-11-23 Thread Julian Reschke
Dean Edridge wrote: The important thing to note here is that he doesn't discuss changes to the spec privately, meaning he makes all decisions publicly. That makes it sound as if these private conversations are indeed one-way. I know that there aren't any private conversations because

Re: The HTML5 process is fair

2008-11-23 Thread Dean Edridge
Julian Reschke wrote: Do we really need this discussion? No, we don't, because I think we've already established that things aren't as bad as you once thought. discuss them with Ian, Dan, Chris or Mike. *Instead* of the mailing list? Dan's the staff contact, work that out with him I