Hello Lachlan
Regarding this:
Dean Edridge wrote:
HTML5 (not so democratic or balanced) author guidelines: Lachlan Hunt ...
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
This is the second time you have attacked me by calling me not so
democratic or balanced,
Sorry, but this is not true. The not so democratic or
James Graham wrote:
Dean Edridge wrote:
It's unfortunate that I'm forced to bring this up in public, but
since I have already expressed my concerns regarding this group
privately with: Ian Hickson, Anne van Kesteren, Lachlan Hunt, Mike
Smith, Chris Wilson and Dan Connolly, but with no
Karl Dubost wrote:
Le 25 déc. 2007 à 02:16, James Graham a écrit :
I don't believe it can; the fatal-exception-on-wellformedness-error
behavior is likely to be unacceptable to any website that values its
uptime.
This is the current common agreement of people though the XML
specification,
On Dec 24, 2007 8:21 AM, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*[snip]*
I'm disappointed to see a lot of anti-XHTML sentiment within the group
considering that this spec is supposed to be both HTML5 and XHTML5 I
would have thought that people could be a bit more open minded than
this. We
Le 25 déc. 2007 à 02:16, James Graham a écrit :
I don't believe it can; the fatal-exception-on-wellformedness-error
behavior is likely to be unacceptable to any website that values its
uptime.
This is the current common agreement of people though the XML
specification, 3rd edition,
Just for the record.
Le 25 déc. 2007 à 06:44, Preston L. Bannister a écrit :
Things are a little non-obvious. I suspect this has mostly to do
with trying to invent a new process (for W3C) on the fly - nothing
inherently bad.
The W3C Process document has *always* evolved with the need of
-public-html
Dean Edridge wrote:
HTML5 (not so democratic or balanced) author guidelines: Lachlan Hunt
(Opera software) Deliberately published his guide with the W3C logo even
though that day there had been several objections to his loose choice of
formatting within the public-html mailing
