I am picky yes, but not needlessly so.
I am not picky about the difference between $XDG_PREFIX/share/icons and
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/icons, although the latter should be used since it has a
clearly defined meaning as documented in
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html#refe
This is to share the happy news that since a few days already the first
xdg-utils beta is available from:
http://portland.freedesktop.org/download/xdg-utils-1.0beta1.tgz
The curious that don't want to bother with unpacking tarballs can read
the documentation here:
Bastian, Waldo wrote:
I am picky about the difference between
$KDE_PREFIX/share/apps/app_name/icons/theme/size/type And
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/apps/app_name/icons/theme/size/type
Because the latter should only be used if there is a specification
that describes its use. And yes, I agree that this is
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:32 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
This paragraph:
The lookup inside a theme is done in three phases. First all the
directories are scanned for an exact match, e.g. one where the allowed
size of the icon files match what was looked up. Then
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 21:58 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 16:13 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
What we need is not just a GNOME solution for the GNOME DeskTop. We
need a solution that works for a GNOME application running on any
Desktop.
