Hi Rich,
Thanks for your feedback. I'll try to incorporate it where feasible.
It would be nice if you had the option of passing the body via stdin.
The attach file method should let you specify the name of the
attachment. This could be useful (for example) if the user has asked
to attach a file
Hi,
I have written a little VFS-browser demo using libxdg-vfs. There are
some nice screenshots at the bottom of this page...
http://www.scheinwelt.at/~norbertf/dadapt/files/xdg_utils/doc/libxdg-vfs.html
It's possible to walk around the hierarchy provided by the VFS libraries
(KIO and
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 23:44 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
and to standardize this they would go in:
$XDG_DATA_DIR/apps/app_name/icons/theme/size/type
If this is not part of the standard, SMcC's posting illustrates that
GNOME does not have a standard way to deal with this and
Rodney Dawes wrote:
GNOME is not the only thing that doesn't have automagical lookup of
app-specific icons in a private directory that mimics the layout of
icon themes. GNOME simply implements the Icon Theme Specification,
which clearly does not state any way to do this. KDE implements
things
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Mon Jun 26 14:11:57 2006, nf2 wrote:
The idea behind this experiment is to align the behavior of KIO and
Gnome-VFS in a common frontend API which could be used from
cross-desktop applications and even file-dialogs (like GTKFileChooser).
Wouldn't it be better for the
John Cherry wrote:
Rumor has it that that the recent release of the Google Earth for Linux
included pre-beta xdg_utils tools.
That's no rumour :-)
$ ls -l /usr/local/google-earth/linux/xdg/
total 28
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12475 Jun 13 11:46 xdg-menu*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10832 Jun 13 11:46
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 08:41 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Yes, KDE's icon names are a mess. But, I don't know of anything that
can't be fixed by renaming them all.
The names aren't really the problem. Names are easily solved with
symlinks and trivial patches to apps. The main issue is that
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 08:41 -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Yes, KDE's icon names are a mess. But, I don't know of anything
that can't be fixed by renaming them all.
The names aren't really the problem. Names are easily solved with
symlinks and trivial patches to apps.
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 21:57 +0200, nf2 wrote:
The problem is, that this will only work for standard file-open/save
dialogs, but a lot of applications want to customize file-dialogs with
their own widgets (previews, filter options, checkboxes etc...). In this
case the coupling between the
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 21:57 +0200, nf2 wrote:
The problem is, that this will only work for standard file-open/save
dialogs, but a lot of applications want to customize file-dialogs with
their own widgets (previews, filter options, checkboxes etc...). In this
case the
nf2 wrote:
Hmm. I'd rather live with little inconsitencies than with fundamental
problems like not beeing able to access VFS shares from applications.
The GUI is meaningless at this point: if any application has access to the
same view of the filesystem and virtual filesystems, they will display
Thiago Macieira wrote:
nf2 wrote:
Hmm. I'd rather live with little inconsitencies than with fundamental
problems like not beeing able to access VFS shares from applications.
The GUI is meaningless at this point: if any application has access to the
same view of the filesystem and
On 6/26/06, nf2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about those bookmarks in Gnome and KDE file-dialogs? If there is no
standard, i guess an interface in libxdg-vfs would be required...
There's been some discussion on using XBEL for this, and some
libraries may already be doing so. I'm afraid I'm a
13 matches
Mail list logo
