On Wednesday 28 June 2006 23:21, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
There *is* KDE GUI configuration in $PREFIX/share/config/. There may
also be other information, but it is the GUI information that I am
concerned with.
please realize that it's more than GUI information in
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 23:30, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Did I miss something?
yes: that application-private icons are out of scope.
If an app is going to request an icon through the Portland interface
library, aren't they going to need to be installed in a standardized
location as well.
James and I agreed that app-specific icons should be installed to the
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/$appname/icons/$theme/... path structure, and that these
such paths should be added automatically to the search list by the icon
theme implementation.
I don't think that applications should be required to install
On Thursday 29 June 2006 01:22, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
icons into a $XDG_DATA_DIRS location. It's ok to add these locations to
the search path
... aside from the performance penalty of having yet more paths to look at? we
already look at a rather large number of directories in the icon spec,
On 6/29/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes that stuff is called contextual metadata and is being integrated
into Tracker(1). It does not relate to just origin as such because
there are other contextual links like attaching a file to an email (IE
the opposite of what you suggested
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 00:00 -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
I don't see KDE needing to do a bunch of work
erm. i do. and i'm going to guess i'm a bit more familiar with the code base?
Well, my patch to implement this feature in GTK+ is a grand total of 4
lines of changes. The first of those is
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:23 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 06:56 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 00:54 schrieb James Richard Tyrer:
This probably doesn't make much difference (at least for now) for KDE
apps and GNOME apps because they will
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 16:30 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:23 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 06:56 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 00:54 schrieb James Richard Tyrer:
This probably doesn't make much difference (at least
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 01:47 -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 01:22, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
icons into a $XDG_DATA_DIRS location. It's ok to add these locations to
the search path
... aside from the performance penalty of having yet more paths to look at?
we
already
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:42 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
Then why do we have a specification that says where to put icons at all?
Why isn't this all just part of the loader documentation?
Because we expect all desktops to show menus and mimetype icons
and for those the provided icons have to be
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:09 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:42 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
Then why do we have a specification that says where to put icons at all?
Why isn't this all just part of the loader documentation?
Because we expect all desktops to show menus
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 17:16 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:09 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:42 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
Then why do we have a specification that says where to put icons at
all? Why isn't this all just part of the loader
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:39 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 17:16 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:09 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 16:42 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
Then why do we have a specification that says where to put
On Thursday 29 June 2006 08:11, Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 00:00 -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
I don't see KDE needing to do a bunch of work
erm. i do. and i'm going to guess i'm a bit more familiar with the code
base?
Well, my patch to implement this feature in GTK+ is a
On Thursday 29 June 2006 09:16, Rodney Dawes wrote:
You (like everyone else seems to be doing) are confusing the term
private, with static. For static icons in an app, of course there is no
need. Those icons are static and part of the application's data section
in the binary, or in a private
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 23:21, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Aaron J. Seigo wrote: There *is* KDE GUI configuration in
$PREFIX/share/config/. There may also be other information, but it
is the GUI information that I am concerned with.
please realize that it's more than
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 01:22, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
icons into a $XDG_DATA_DIRS location. It's ok to add these locations to
the search path
... aside from the performance penalty of having yet more paths to look at? we
already look at a rather large number of
Claes at work wrote:
On 6/28/06, Bastian, Waldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, sounds very useful.
I have created a wiki page on extended attributes:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CommonExtendedAttributes
I have documented current practise, as well as proposed a few new
attributes that
18 matches
Mail list logo
