On 4/27/07, James Richard Tyrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it, the problem is that we don't have a proper set of HiColor
icons. Someone moved all the existing HiColor icons to KDEClassic and
for some reason all new HiColor icons were removed. Then some HiColor
icons were renamed
There was no special intention behind the trailing slash and I agree
that it could be removed to be more consistent with common ways to
specify paths. Implementations should behave properly either way.
Cheers,
Waldo
Intel Corporation - Platform Software Engineering, UMG - Hillsboro,
Oregon
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On 4/27/07, James Richard Tyrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it, the problem is that we don't have a proper set of
HiColor icons. Someone moved all the existing HiColor icons to
KDEClassic and for some reason all new HiColor icons were removed.
Then some HiColor
On Friday 27 April 2007 21:39:48 James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On 4/27/07, James Richard Tyrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it, the problem is that we don't have a proper set of
HiColor icons. Someone moved all the existing HiColor icons to
KDEClassic and for
On Friday 27 April 2007 21:58:27 Kenneth Wimer wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 21:39:48 James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On 4/27/07, James Richard Tyrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it, the problem is that we don't have a proper set of
HiColor icons. Someone moved
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
You say yourself that icon themes will never be complete...so the hicolor
theme you desire also fails in this way...not sure what you want exactly.
Yes, a complete icon set should never be presumed, that is why I have
clearly stated that there needs to be a way to
