Re: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-31 Thread Rémi
Bastian, Waldo wrote: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) said: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:45:00 -0700 Bastian, Waldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Prefix with ./ sounds good: * If it starts with / it's an absolute path * If it starts with ./ is's a relative path * Everything else is a themed

Re: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-29 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Bastian, Waldo wrote: If implementations other than KDE have implement/intent to implement this as well it can be added to the Desktop Entry Spec, yes. That shouldn't be hard to implement. But there should be some agreement on how to identify relative paths. Prefix with ./? Scan for /?

RE: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-28 Thread Bastian, Waldo
DTL Tech Board Chairman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdg- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rémi Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 2:22 PM To: xdg@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: .desktop files with relative icons ? Thanks for your answer. It seems to work for KDE indeed

RE: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-28 Thread Bastian, Waldo
://www.intel.com/opensource OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman -Original Message- From: Benedikt Meurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:41 AM To: Bastian, Waldo Cc: Rémi; xdg@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: .desktop files with relative icons ? Bastian, Waldo wrote

Re: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-28 Thread The Rasterman
: Rémi; xdg@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: .desktop files with relative icons ? Bastian, Waldo wrote: If implementations other than KDE have implement/intent to implement this as well it can be added to the Desktop Entry Spec, yes. That shouldn't be hard to implement. But there should

Re: .desktop files with relative icons ?

2006-08-27 Thread Rémi
Thanks for your answer. It seems to work for KDE indeed. Shouldn't this behaviour (relative filenames in the Icon= field) be described in the Desktop Entry Specification ? e.g. for the kind of usage I was describing previously. Best regards, Rémi On Wednesday 23 August 2006 00:55,