On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The need for 8844ed299a ("x86/dmop: Fix compat_dm_op() ABI") has made
> clear that its presence is actively dangerous. At the hypercall entry
> points XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM() should be used anyway (regardless of
> whether these are native or compat entry
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:45:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The need for 8844ed299a ("x86/dmop: Fix compat_dm_op() ABI") has made
> clear that its presence is actively dangerous. At the hypercall entry
> points XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM() should be used anyway (regardless of
> whether these are
The need for 8844ed299a ("x86/dmop: Fix compat_dm_op() ABI") has made
clear that its presence is actively dangerous. At the hypercall entry
points XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM() should be used anyway (regardless of
whether these are native or compat entry points), and passing around
handles internally