On 06/12/16 11:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Their size parameters being "unsigned", there's neither a point for
> them returning "unsigned long", nor for any of their (assembly)
> arithmetic to involved 64-bit operations on other than addresses.
>
> Take the opportunity and fold __do_clear_user() into
Their size parameters being "unsigned", there's neither a point for
them returning "unsigned long", nor for any of their (assembly)
arithmetic to involved 64-bit operations on other than addresses.
Take the opportunity and fold __do_clear_user() into its single user
(using qword stores instead of
