Hi Igor,
On 08/07/2021 03:06, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 07/07/2021 14:21, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin
On 07/07/2021 14:21, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this
On 08/07/2021 02:26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/07/2021 02:14, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 08/07/2021 02:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/07/2021 02:08, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 07/07/2021 10:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
+++
On 08/07/2021 02:14, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 08/07/2021 02:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/07/2021 02:08, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2021 10:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h
On 08/07/2021 02:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/07/2021 02:08, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 07/07/2021 10:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ int xc_domain_ioport_permission(xc_interface
On 08/07/2021 02:08, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 07/07/2021 10:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ int xc_domain_ioport_permission(xc_interface
*xch,
int
On 07/07/2021 10:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ int xc_domain_ioport_permission(xc_interface *xch,
int xc_domain_irq_permission(xc_interface *xch,
On 07.07.2021 15:21, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/07/2021 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.07.2021 14:59, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The alternative suggestion is to keep a unsigned type but check the bit
>>> 31 is not set.
>>
>> Why? Why not bit 30 or bit 27? There's nothing special about
>> bit 31
On 07/07/2021 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing
On 07.07.2021 14:59, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/07/2021 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing failures on modern hardware with
On 07/07/2021 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
On 07.07.2021 14:51, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
>> causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
>> XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission ABI structure where it needs
Hi Igor,
On 07/07/2021 02:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission ABI structure where it needs to be fixed up
as well. Internal Xen
On 07/07/2021 08:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h
>> @@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ int xc_domain_ioport_permission(xc_interface *xch,
>>
>> int xc_domain_irq_permission(xc_interface *xch,
>> uint32_t domid,
>> -
On 7 Jul 2021, at 02:02, Igor Druzhinin
mailto:igor.druzhi...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission ABI structure where it needs to be
On 07.07.2021 03:02, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
> causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
> XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission ABI structure where it needs to be fixed up
> as well. Internal Xen
Current unit8_t for pirq argument in this interface is too restrictive
causing failures on modern hardware with lots of GSIs. That extends down to
XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission ABI structure where it needs to be fixed up
as well. Internal Xen structures appear to be fine. Existing users of
the
17 matches
Mail list logo