Hi Henry,
On 08/03/2024 03:05, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On 2/26/2024 6:43 PM, Michal Orzel wrote:
> xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> +/* PE not implemented using a multithreading type approach. */
> +
Hi everyone,
On 2/26/2024 6:43 PM, Michal Orzel wrote:
xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+/* PE not implemented using a multithreading type approach. */
+if ( system_cpuinfo.mpidr.mt == 0 )
Do we need this check? It mt was true,
Hi Michal,
On 2/26/2024 6:43 PM, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 26/02/2024 10:54, Wang, Henry wrote:
xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+/* PE not implemented using a multithreading type approach. */
+if ( system_cpuinfo.mpidr.mt == 0 )
Do we
On 26/02/2024 10:54, Wang, Henry wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: Set correct per-cpu cpu_core_mask
>>
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> On 26/02/2024 04:01, Henry Wang w
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hi Michal,
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: Set correct per-cpu cpu_core_mask
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> On 26/02/2024 04:01, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Wang
> NIT: You first sent this patch as p
Hi Henry,
On 26/02/2024 04:01, Henry Wang wrote:
> In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of
> cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of CPU0.
> Currently on Arm this is a fixed value 1 (can be checked via xl info),
> which is not correct. This is because
In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of
cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of CPU0.
Currently on Arm this is a fixed value 1 (can be checked via xl info),
which is not correct. This is because during the Arm CPU online
process at boot time,
