Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/alternative: Replace a continue with a goto

On 22.04.2024 20:14, Andrew Cooper wrote: > A subsequent patch is going to insert a loop, which interferes with the > continue in the devirtualisation logic. > > Replace it with a goto, and a paragraph explaining why we intentionally avoid > setting a->priv = 1. > > No functional change. > >

[PATCH 4/6] x86/alternative: Replace a continue with a goto

A subsequent patch is going to insert a loop, which interferes with the continue in the devirtualisation logic. Replace it with a goto, and a paragraph explaining why we intentionally avoid setting a->priv = 1. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich CC: Roger