On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 09:55:18AM +0800, Yong Huang wrote:
> Indeed, for the GLOBAL_DIRTY_DIRTY_RATE and GLOBAL_DIRTY_LIMIT
> dirty tracking, they should handle the failure path of logging start.
> The work may be done once the current patchset is merged.
Thanks for confirming this, Yong. I
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:19 PM Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 07:49:07AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > Now that the log_global*() handlers take an Error** parameter and
> > return a bool, do the same for memory_global_dirty_log_start() and
> > memory_global_dirty_log_stop().
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 07:49:07AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Now that the log_global*() handlers take an Error** parameter and
> return a bool, do the same for memory_global_dirty_log_start() and
> memory_global_dirty_log_stop(). The error is reported in the callers
> for now and it will be
Cédric Le Goater writes:
> Now that the log_global*() handlers take an Error** parameter and
> return a bool, do the same for memory_global_dirty_log_start() and
> memory_global_dirty_log_stop(). The error is reported in the callers
> for now and it will be propagated in the call stack in the
Now that the log_global*() handlers take an Error** parameter and
return a bool, do the same for memory_global_dirty_log_start() and
memory_global_dirty_log_stop(). The error is reported in the callers
for now and it will be propagated in the call stack in the next
changes.
To be noted a
