On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 10:06:27PM +, Li, Xin3 wrote:
> Do I need to send an updated patch?
> Or just leave it to the maintainer who is going to take care of it?
While waiting, please take a look at this:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/35] x86/cpufeatures,opcode,msr: Add the
> WRMSRNS instruction support
>
> Or simply "x86/fred: Add ... "
Do I need to send an updated patch?
Or just leave it to the maintainer who is going to take care of it?
>
> Other than that,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:49:50AM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/35] x86/cpufeatures,opcode,msr: Add the WRMSRNS
> instruction support
Or simply "x86/fred: Add ... "
Other than that,
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://p
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 02:49:50 -0800
Xin Li wrote:
> WRMSRNS is an instruction that behaves exactly like WRMSR, with
> the only difference being that it is not a serializing instruction
> by default. Under certain conditions, WRMSRNS may replace WRMSR to
> improve performance.
>
> Add its CPU
WRMSRNS is an instruction that behaves exactly like WRMSR, with
the only difference being that it is not a serializing instruction
by default. Under certain conditions, WRMSRNS may replace WRMSR to
improve performance.
Add its CPU feature bit, opcode to the x86 opcode map, and an
always inline
