Re: [PATCH v2] x86: amend 'n' debug-key output with SMI count

2024-02-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.02.2024 10:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:15:51AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -407,9 +407,15 @@ void __init early_cpu_init(bool verbose) >> paddr_bits -= (ebx >> 6) & 0x3f; >>

Re: [PATCH v2] x86: amend 'n' debug-key output with SMI count

2024-02-16 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:15:51AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... if available only, of course. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > --- > I don't really like issuing an IPI (and having another cf_check > function) here, yet then again this is issued only when the debug key > is actually used, and

[PATCH v2] x86: amend 'n' debug-key output with SMI count

2024-02-14 Thread Jan Beulich
... if available only, of course. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- I don't really like issuing an IPI (and having another cf_check function) here, yet then again this is issued only when the debug key is actually used, and given how simple the handling function is (including that it doesn't use