On 14.10.2021 11:03, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> On 14 Oct 2021, at 07:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 13.10.2021 21:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich
Hi Jan,
> On 14 Oct 2021, at 07:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2021 21:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné
Hi,
> On 14 Oct 2021, at 07:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2021 21:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 13.10.2021 21:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++
On 13.10.2021 16:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ *
On 13.10.21 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>>>
On 13.10.2021 10:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
>>
On 13.10.2021 12:02, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 13 Oct 2021, at 07:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2021 23:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Good point about MSIs not being setup before the traps. We should remove
>>> the call to pci_cleanup_msi() in the error path then.
>>
>> Your reply
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:48:42AM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> > On 13 Oct 2021, at 09:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
> >> When the device is
Hi Jan,
> On 13 Oct 2021, at 07:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2021 23:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 11.10.2021 20:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
> On 13 Oct 2021, at 09:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
> access is added to the Xen to emulate the PCI
On 12.10.2021 23:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.10.2021 20:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 20:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> >
Hi Julien,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 17:20, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/2021 17:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>>> On 12 Oct 2021, at 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2021 13:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> Hi Bertrand,
>>>
As Rahul is on
On 12/10/2021 17:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 12 Oct 2021, at 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/10/2021 13:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Jan,
Hi Bertrand,
As Rahul is on leave, I will answer you and make the changes needed.
On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Julien,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 11/10/2021 13:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
>> As Rahul is on leave, I will answer you and make the changes needed.
>>> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Independent of this - is bare
On 11/10/2021 13:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Jan,
Hi Bertrand,
As Rahul is on leave, I will answer you and make the changes needed.
On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
Independent of this - is bare metal Arm enforcing this same
alignment restriction (unconditionally)? Iirc on
Hi Julien,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 15:32, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 06/10/2021 18:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
>> index c9277b5c6d..91d614b37e 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
>> +++
Hi Rahul,
On 06/10/2021 18:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
index c9277b5c6d..91d614b37e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define __ASM_DOMAIN_H__
#include
On 11.10.2021 20:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> But digging deeper into this, I would have 2
Hi Stefano,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 20:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 11.10.21 20:15, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +,
On 11.10.21 22:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 11.10.21 20:15, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 11.10.21 20:15, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> >> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11.10.21 19:12, Bertrand
On 11.10.21 20:15, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.10.21 19:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 11:51,
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> >> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> > ---
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11.10.21 19:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
On 11 Oct 2021, at 11:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:20:14PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 11.10.21 19:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> >> On 11 Oct 2021, at 11:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >>> The existing VPCI
On 11.10.21 19:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 11:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 11:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for
Hi Jan,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 15:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh
On 11.10.2021 15:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> @@
Hi Jan,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ *
On 11.10.2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can
Hi Jan,
As Rahul is on leave, I will answer you and make the changes needed.
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 14:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
>> +/*
>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>> + *
>> + * This program
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:34PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
> access is added to the Xen to emulate the PCI
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +/*
> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + *
The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
“PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
access is added to the Xen to emulate the PCI devices config space.
A MMIO trap handler for the PCI ECAM space is
39 matches
Mail list logo