Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
> Long term, I would expect a similar check to be necessary to set the
> vCPI flag at the domain creation. So it would be best to introduce an
> internal fi
Michal Orzel writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 15.10.2021 13:46, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Maybe something like
> >
> > // NB, on ARM, libxl__arch_blah directly examines num_pcidevs to
> &g
Hi Michal,
On 15/10/2021 12:53, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 15.10.2021 13:46, Ian Jackson wrote:
Michal Orzel writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in
libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
On 15.10.2021 12:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
Can you leave a comment somew
On 15.10.2021 13:46, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Michal Orzel writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
> node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 15.10.2021 12:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Can you leave a comment somewhere (near where c_info.p
Michal Orzel writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 15.10.2021 12:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Can you leave a comment somewhere (near where c_info.passthrough is
> > set) pointing to this use of num_p
On 15.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15.10.2021 12:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
>> node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
>>> On 14/10/2021 18:54, Ian Jackson wro
Hi,
On 15.10.2021 12:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
> node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 14/10/2021 18:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> ...
>>> That is, as I understand it on ARM vpci sh
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 14/10/2021 18:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > That is, as I understand it on ARM vpci should be enabled if
> > passthrough is enabled and not otherwise
Hi Michal,
On 15/10/2021 08:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
Do you agree on the following approach:
1. Modify argument of libxl__arch_domain_init_hw_description to
libxl_domain_config (patch 1)
2. Modify argument of libxl__prepare_dtb to libxl_domain_config (patch 2)
3. Remove arch_arm.vpci completely
Hi guys,
On 15.10.2021 09:28, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 14/10/2021 18:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> (Replying to both the earlier subthread on v5 and to the new v6
>> patch.)
>>
>> Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI
>> device tree node in libxl"):
>>>
Hi Ian,
On 14/10/2021 18:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
(Replying to both the earlier subthread on v5 and to the new v6
patch.)
Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl"):
Now you suggest to add a new field arm_vpci in
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (Replying to both the earlier subthread on v5 and to the new v6
> patch.)
>
> Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device
> tree node in libxl"):
> > Now you suggest to add a new field arm_vpci in
(Replying to both the earlier subthread on v5 and to the new v6
patch.)
Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device
tree node in libxl"):
> Now you suggest to add a new field arm_vpci in libxl__domain_create_state.
Hi. I was handwaving, hence "probably" :-).
13 matches
Mail list logo
