On 2024/1/11 04:09, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> On 1/5/24 02:09, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
>> index f5a71ee5f78d..eeb975bd0194 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
>> @@ -653,12 +653,20 @@ long
On 1/5/24 02:09, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
> index f5a71ee5f78d..eeb975bd0194 100644
> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
> @@ -653,12 +653,20 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> u_domctl)
>
Thank Jan and Roger, I may know how to add a new hypercall
XEN_DOMCTL_gsi_permission, I will implement it in next version.
On 2024/1/9 18:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.01.2024 11:16, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/1/9 17:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.01.2024 09:18, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
A
On 09.01.2024 11:16, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/1/9 17:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.01.2024 09:18, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> A new hypercall using for granting gsi? If so, how does the caller know to
>>> call which hypercall to grant permission, XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission or that
>>> new
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:16:26AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/1/9 17:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 09.01.2024 09:18, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> >> On 2024/1/8 23:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano
On 2024/1/9 17:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.01.2024 09:18, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/1/8 23:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> ---
On 09.01.2024 09:18, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/1/8 23:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
> +++
On 2024/1/8 23:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
--- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
+++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
@@ -1418,6
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
> >> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
> >> @@ -1418,6 +1418,7 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc
On 06.01.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
>> @@ -1418,6 +1418,7 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
>> unsigned long long start, end, flags, size;
>> int
On 2024/1/6 09:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, current
>> implementation is not suitable for those domain.
>>
>> When passthrough a device to guest on PVH dom0, this
>>
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> > Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, current
> > implementation is not suitable for those domain.
> >
> > When passthrough a device to guest on PVH dom0, this
> >
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, current
> implementation is not suitable for those domain.
>
> When passthrough a device to guest on PVH dom0, this
> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will failed
> at domain_pirq_to_irq.
>
> So,
Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, current
implementation is not suitable for those domain.
When passthrough a device to guest on PVH dom0, this
pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will failed
at domain_pirq_to_irq.
So, change it to use gsi to grant/revoke irq permission.
And
14 matches
Mail list logo
