On 24.01.2024 09:20, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 22/01/24 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.01.2024 14:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
>>> @@ -64,6 +64,14 @@
>>> # define fallthroughdo {} while (0) /* fallthrough
On 22/01/24 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.2024 14:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
Introduce macro static_asser_unreachable() to check that a program
point is considered unreachable by the static analysis performed by the
compiler, even at optimization level -O0.
Is it really intended to
On 22.01.2024 14:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Introduce macro static_asser_unreachable() to check that a program
> point is considered unreachable by the static analysis performed by the
> compiler, even at optimization level -O0.
Is it really intended to limit use of this macro to cases where
Introduce macro static_asser_unreachable() to check that a program
point is considered unreachable by the static analysis performed by the
compiler, even at optimization level -O0.
The use of such macro will lead to one of the following outcomes:
- the program point identified by the macro is
