Re: [XEN PATCH 2/9] x86: don't access x86_cpu_to_apicid[] directly, use cpu_physical_id(cpu)

2024-03-12 Thread Jan Beulich
On 12.03.2024 16:18, Krystian Hebel wrote: > On 7.02.2024 17:28, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 14.11.2023 18:49, Krystian Hebel wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c >>> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ __next: >>>*/ >>> if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == -1U) >>>

Re: [XEN PATCH 2/9] x86: don't access x86_cpu_to_apicid[] directly, use cpu_physical_id(cpu)

2024-03-12 Thread Krystian Hebel
On 7.02.2024 17:28, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.11.2023 18:49, Krystian Hebel wrote: --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ __next: */ if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == -1U) boot_cpu_physical_apicid = get_apic_id(); -x86_cpu_to_apicid[0] =

Re: [XEN PATCH 2/9] x86: don't access x86_cpu_to_apicid[] directly, use cpu_physical_id(cpu)

2024-02-07 Thread Jan Beulich
On 14.11.2023 18:49, Krystian Hebel wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ __next: > */ > if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == -1U) > boot_cpu_physical_apicid = get_apic_id(); > -x86_cpu_to_apicid[0] = get_apic_id(); > +

Re: [XEN PATCH 2/9] x86: don't access x86_cpu_to_apicid[] directly, use cpu_physical_id(cpu)

2024-01-26 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 14/11/2023 17:49, Krystian Hebel wrote: This is done in preparation to move data from x86_cpu_to_apicid[] elsewhere. NIT: I would add "No functional changes intended". Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel Reviewed-by: Julien Grall Cheers, -- Julien Grall

[XEN PATCH 2/9] x86: don't access x86_cpu_to_apicid[] directly, use cpu_physical_id(cpu)

2023-11-14 Thread Krystian Hebel
This is done in preparation to move data from x86_cpu_to_apicid[] elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c | 4 ++-- xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c | 2 +- xen/arch/x86/apic.c | 2 +- xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c | 4 ++--