On 2024-04-08 09:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
Refactor the switch so that a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.2 is
resolved
(A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
Note that the
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> Refactor the switch so that a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved
> (A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
> compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
> Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
>
Refactor the switch so that a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved
(A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to