On 2024-04-09 02:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
NAK for this part again.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ int
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
>
> NAK for this part again.
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> > @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ int allocate_and_map_gsi_pirq(struct
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
NAK for this part again.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ int allocate_and_map_gsi_pirq(struct domain *d, int
> index, int *pirq_p)
> int
Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
Refactor the clauses so that a MISRA C Rule 16.2 violation is resolved
(A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
