On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> > @@ -169,20 +169,22 @@ static void __init
> > efi_arch_process_memory_map(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable,
> >
> > switch (
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> @@ -169,20 +169,22 @@ static void __init
> efi_arch_process_memory_map(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable,
>
> switch ( desc->Type )
> {
> +default:
> +
Refactor the first clauses so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (a switch label, "default" in this
case, should be immediately enclosed in the compound statement
of the switch). Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule
