On 19.04.2024 09:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
> @@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ static int domain_teardown(struct domain *d)
>
> for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
> {
> +/* SAF-5-safe MISRA C Rule 16.2: switch label enclosed by for
>
MISRA C Rule 16.2 states:
"A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement".
The PROGRESS_VCPU local helper specifies a case that is directly
inside the compound statement of a for loop, hence violating the rule.
To avoid
