[linux-linus test] 184754: regressions - FAIL

flight 184754 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184754/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 184738 Tests which did

[xen-unstable test] 184752: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 184752 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184752/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 184732

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: fix stubdom PCI addr

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > From: Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) > > When running in a stubdomain, the config space access via sysfs needs to > use BDF as seen inside stubdomain (connected via xen-pcifront), which is > different from the real BDF. For other

[linux-linus test] 184749: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 184749 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184749/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel broken test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel 5

Re: question about virtio-vsock on xen

On 23.02.24 23:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi Peng, Hello Peng, Stefano > > We haven't tried to setup virtio-vsock yet. > > In general, I am very supportive of using QEMU for virtio backends. We > use QEMU to provide virtio-net, virtio-block, virtio-console and more. > > However,

[ovmf test] 184751: all pass - PUSHED

flight 184751 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184751/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 7fa4a984c438b897086f5e2fea6b9e9ad17867c4 baseline version: ovmf

[xen-unstable test] 184746: regressions - FAIL

flight 184746 xen-unstable real [real] flight 184750 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184746/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184750/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be

Re: IMPORTANT - : Need help on USB port virtualization with Xen hypervisor

Hi Dominique and Francois, Thank you for the report. I am CCing some person who I think could help. I also have some questions (see below). On 23/02/2024 16:00, GOURLOT Francois wrote: Dear All, We send you a message few days ago. We have major performance with XEN USB Drivers. We use your

Re: [XEN PATCH] xen: cache clearing and invalidation helpers refactoring

Hi Stefano, On 2024-02-24 00:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote: On 2024-02-19 16:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > The cache clearing and invalidation helpers in x86 and Arm didn't > comply with MISRA C Rule 17.7: "The value returned by a function > having

[linux-linus test] 184738: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 184738 linux-linus real [real] flight 184748 linux-linus real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184738/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/184748/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):