On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 19:00 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 13.06.23 18:19, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:44 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > Previous patches have done the first step, so next move the
> > > > callers
> > > > that
> > > > don't have a VMA to
On 13.06.23 18:19, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:44 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
Previous patches have done the first step, so next move the callers
that
don't have a VMA to pte_mkwrite_novma(). Also do the same for
I hear x86 maintainers asking to drop "previous patches"
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:44 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Previous patches have done the first step, so next move the callers
> > that
> > don't have a VMA to pte_mkwrite_novma(). Also do the same for
>
> I hear x86 maintainers asking to drop "previous patches" ;-)
>
> Maybe
> This is the
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 14:27 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand
Thanks!
On 13.06.23 02:10, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
The x86 Shadow stack feature includes a new type of memory called shadow
stack. This shadow stack memory has some unusual properties, which requires
some core mm changes to function properly.
One of these unusual properties is that shadow stack memory is
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:10:28PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> The x86 Shadow stack feature includes a new type of memory called shadow
> stack. This shadow stack memory has some unusual properties, which requires
> some core mm changes to function properly.
>
> One of these unusual properties
The x86 Shadow stack feature includes a new type of memory called shadow
stack. This shadow stack memory has some unusual properties, which requires
some core mm changes to function properly.
One of these unusual properties is that shadow stack memory is writable,
but only in limited ways. These
