29.04.24 18:28, Jan Beulich:
Any reason you don't follow the approach used in patch 7, putting simple
#ifdef in the switch() in vpmu_init()? That would avoid the need for the
three almost identical stubs.
I didn't want to put that many preprocessor statements into this small
switch() block (4
On 23.04.2024 10:48, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/vpmu.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/vpmu.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #define __ASM_X86_HVM_VPMU_H_
>
> #include
> +#include
>
> #define vcpu_vpmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.vpmu)
> #define vpmu_vcpu(vpmu)
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> Build AMD vPMU when CONFIG_AMD is on, and Intel vPMU when CONFIG_INTEL
> is on respectively, allowing for a plaftorm-specific build. Also separate
> arch_vpmu_ops initializers using these options and static inline stubs.
>
> No functional change
Build AMD vPMU when CONFIG_AMD is on, and Intel vPMU when CONFIG_INTEL
is on respectively, allowing for a plaftorm-specific build. Also separate
arch_vpmu_ops initializers using these options and static inline stubs.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sergiy Kibrik
CC: Andrew Cooper
